Effect of Tungsten Electrode Eccentricity on Microstructure and Properties of TC4 Welded Joints in Rotary Tungsten Inert Gas Welding
Source abstract
Abstract
Experiments were conducted to investigate the microstructure and properties of Ti‐6Al‐4V rotational arc welded joints using tungsten electrodes with varying eccentricities. The arc's rotation during welding expanded the heated area around the groove, increasing the heat‐affected zone (HAZ) width. The weld zone primarily consists of lath martensite. Increasing electrode eccentricity reduces low‐angle grain boundaries and causes a nonlinear change in grain size. At 0.75 mm eccentricity, the average grain size reaches a minimum of 0.72 μm. The dislocation angle range for the α phase in the weld zone is 1.05°–4.35°, 55.6°–65.3°, and 88.3°–90.45°. Static tensile strength values for the HAZ and weld zones exceed the base metal by over 97% (940 MPa), with elongation after fracture reaching 80% (11.14%) of the base metal's value. Impact toughness also surpasses over 80% (490.25 KJ m −2 ). Furthermore, at 0.75 mm eccentricity, impact toughness increases by more than 10% compared to other eccentricities, emphasizing the strengthening effect of fine grains on material impact toughness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Engineering and Environmental Studies · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Research Center for Remanufacturing Army Academy of Armored Forces Beijing 100072 China
College of Mechanical Engineering Anhui University of Science and Technology Huainan 232001 China
Fujian Key Laboratory of Special Energy Manufacturing Xiamen Key Laboratory of Digital Vision Measurement Huaqiao University Xiamen 361021 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13896210.1016/j.msea.2020.138962 ↗
2. 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-110.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-1 ↗
3. Wu T. · Volume · 2022 · 197 · 110817
4. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10896510.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108965 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1875-5372(10)60021-510.1016/S1875-5372(10)60021-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.02210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.022 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.04310.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043 ↗
8. 10.1361/105994905X7544810.1361/105994905X75448 ↗
9. 10.1177/095440541453724410.1177/0954405414537244 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.05.01110.1016/j.optlastec.2017.05.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.00110.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.001 ↗
12. Mao Z. · Hot Work. Technol. · 2015 · 44 · 166
13. Wu D. · Hot Work. Technol. · 2018 · 47 · 192
14. 10.1179/1362171814Y.000000020310.1179/1362171814Y.0000000203 ↗
15. Justus Panicker C.T. · Mater. Today Commun. · 2024 · 220 · 112837
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11676910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116769 ↗
17. 10.29391/2018.97.02410.29391/2018.97.024 ↗
18. 10.3390/met1405059610.3390/met14050596 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.16961410.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169614 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.00510.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.00710.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.04410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.044 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.09110.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.091 ↗