journal article·2025-08Open access

Very High‐Cycle Bending Fatigue Properties of Selective Laser Melted TC4 Alloys

Haibiao Yin, Piao Li, Weixing Yao

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 27· Issue 15

Abstract

Titanium alloys manufactured using selective laser melting (SLM) technology have found widespread applications in aerospace and other industries. However, there is a significant lack of high‐cycle fatigue S–N curves for titanium alloys manufactured by SLM, particularly for fatigue data in the range of 107–108 cycles. This lack of data limits the ability to assess fatigue life under wide‐frequency vibration conditions. Herein, very high‐cycle fatigue (VHCF) tests are conducted on TC4 titanium alloys manufactured by SLM in both vertical and horizontal orientations, and the corresponding S–N curves are obtained, which address the critical gap in VHCF data for SLM‐manufactured TC4 titanium alloys under bending fatigue conditions, particularly in the range of 107–108 cycles. Subsequently, the fracture surfaces are examined and analyzed using an optical microscopy and a scanning electron microscopy, and defect dimensions are measured by computed tomography scan system. Finally, the fatigue performance of the SLM‐manufactured titanium alloys is compared with that of the conventionally manufactured titanium alloys.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Aerospace Structures Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing 210016 China

Zhejiang‐Italy Joint Lab for Smart Materials and Advanced Structures School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Ningbo University Ningbo 315211 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.31010.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.310 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.09910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.099 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.009 ↗
4. Gupta A. · Proc. Struct. Integr. · 2023 · 46 · 35
5. 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.00510.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.04110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.041 ↗
7. Sivasubramanian P. · 2024
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10755210.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
10. Xi J. · Materials · 2021 · 14 · 62
11. 10.1016/j.mtla.2024.10200810.1016/j.mtla.2024.102008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.01010.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.04210.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.042 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.03.00410.1016/j.cirp.2021.03.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.02110.1016/j.msea.2018.03.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14069310.1016/j.msea.2020.140693 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.015 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10581110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105811 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10558410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105584 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10600810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.13510.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.135 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10619110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106191 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00005-510.1016/S0142-1123(99)00005-5 ↗
24. Murakami Y. · 2002
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10813610.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108136 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12740810.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127408 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00176-410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00176-4 ↗