journal article·2025-06Open access

Effects of Silver on the Strength in the T8 Condition and the Heat Resistance of Al–Cu–Li–Sc Alloy

Hao Xue, Zhiqi Wang, Jiaming Li, Junyuan Bai, Zhihao Zhao, Gaowu Qin

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 27· Issue 12

Abstract

Silver (Ag) is widely used in commercial Al–Cu–Li alloys to enhance their mechanical performance. However, this study reveals a paradoxical effect of Ag incorporation in an Al–Cu–Li–Sc alloy. Ag significantly improves the strength of Al–Cu–Li–Sc alloy in the T8 condition, but it simultaneously compromises its heat resistance. This negative impact is primarily due to the formation of excessive Ag‐ and Cu‐containing phases, such as Al 6 CuLi 3 ‐T 2 phase and irregular high‐contrasting phases, which are promoted by the presence of Ag and thus leading to a reduction in the coarsening resistance of T1 precipitates (Al 2 CuLi phase). The study further demonstrates that higher thermal exposure temperature and increased Ag content exacerbate this adverse effect. This research clarifies the dual role of Ag and offers valuable insights for the compositional design of heat‐resistant Al–Cu–Li–Sc alloys, depending on the specific service conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials (MoE) School of Materials Science and Engineering Northeastern University Shenyang 110819 China

Research Center for Metallic Wires Northeastern University Shenyang 110819 China

Institute for Strategic Materials and Components Shenyang University of Chemical Technology Shenyang 110142 China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.00210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-610.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.27410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.274 ↗
4. Prasad N. E. · 2013
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.07810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.078 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11176710.1016/j.matdes.2023.111767 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0264859810.1007/BF02648598 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14720910.1016/j.msea.2024.147209 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.00110.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.02910.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.029 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.05010.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.050 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.19710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.197 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.04.07310.1016/j.jmst.2024.04.073 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00651-510.1016/S1359-6462(00)00651-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.11627010.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116270 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11519110.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115191 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11400910.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2023.14515810.1016/j.msea.2023.145158 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.11133310.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111333 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.05.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2017.05.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.00410.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11355810.1016/j.matchar.2023.113558 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.07.05010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.07.050 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.10809510.1016/j.corsci.2019.108095 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11018410.1016/j.matchar.2020.110184 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.00410.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.04310.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.043 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.00910.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.009 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11018610.1016/j.matchar.2020.110186 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.02110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.021 ↗