journal article·2024-11Open access

Prediction of Time–Temperature–Transformation Diagrams of NiAl Alloy: An Evaluation of Intelligent Algorithms

Leonardo Hernández‐Flores, Luis Fernando Talavera‐Rivera, Angel‐Iván García‐Moreno

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 21

Abstract

Time‐temperature‐transformation diagrams are essential in the field of metallurgy. However, constructing these diagrams through empirical and simulating methods can be time‐consuming and expensive. Therefore, there is a need to develop accurate and affordable alternatives that can rapidly predict TTT diagrams. The present study offers a novel analysis of multiple algorithms for predicting TTT diagrams, as well as an examination of various data preprocessing techniques (data augmentation ‐ DA and exploratory data analysis ‐ EDA). A database is created by integrating multiple data sources and increased using DA by ensuring the synthetic data remains physically realistic and meaningful. Subsequently, an EDA is performed to prepare the data before its use in training. The influence of each hyperparameter on the prediction was studied and optimal hyperparameter configuration was defined for each algorithm. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated using RMSLE, RMSE, R 2 , Mean IoU, and SMAPE. The multilayer perceptron demonstrated the greatest robustness in predicting TTT curves. Additionally, the Ft‐Transformer is a viable alternative if an appropriately sized dataset is available. These results provide valuable insights into the use of Machine Learning techniques as a new alternative in predicting isothermal transformation curves.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Industrial Technology and Control Systems · Material Science and Thermodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI) Av. Playa Pie de la Cuesta No. 702 Querétaro 76125 Mexico

Investigadores por México‐CONAHCYT National Council for Humanities, Science, and Technology of Mexico (CONAHCYT) Av Insurgentes Sur. 1582 CDMX 03940 Mexico

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Reed R. C. · 2008
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10079710.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100797 ↗
3. 10.1007/s42243-023-00932-610.1007/s42243-023-00932-6 ↗
4. 10.1002/srin.20210026710.1002/srin.202100267 ↗
5. 10.1002/adem.20200129910.1002/adem.202001299 ↗
6. 10.3390/met1104057810.3390/met11040578 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1524876710.3390/ma15248767 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15369410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153694 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10928210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109282 ↗
10. Z.Gao X.Fan T.Xia W.Xue S.Gao inJournal of Physics: Conf. Series Vol.2459 IOP Publishing Chongqing China October2023 p.012139.10.1088/1742-6596/2459/1/012139 ↗
11. 10.1080/1042691080261223910.1080/10426910802612239 ↗
12. N.Pillai R.Karthikeyan inIOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering Vol.346 IOP Publishing Dubai UAE November2018 p.012067.10.1088/1757-899X/346/1/012067 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.03.05010.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.03.050 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.13610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.136 ↗
15. Minamoto S. · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.: Methods · 2022 · 2 · 402
16. 10.1007/s10853-023-08322-910.1007/s10853-023-08322-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.03810.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.038 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10923510.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109235 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11663-998-0101-310.1007/s11663-998-0101-3 ↗
20. 10.3390/met1307116810.3390/met13071168 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.00110.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.001 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1511379210.3390/ma15113792 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1416449210.3390/ma14164492 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11837-020-04057-z10.1007/s11837-020-04057-z ↗
25. Chapra S. C. · 2015 · 490
26. Arthur M. K. · 2015
27. N.Patki R.Wedge K.Veeramachaneni inDSAA IEEE Montreal Canada October2016 pp.399–410.10.1109/DSAA.2016.49 ↗
28. Xu L. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process Syst. · 2019 · 32 · 7335
29. Berger V. W. · 2014
30. 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.325024110.1109/TPAMI.2023.3250241 ↗
31. 10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.000110.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 ↗
32. R.Turner D.Eriksson M.McCourt J.Kiili E.Laaksonen Z.Xu I.Guyon inProc. NeurIPS ’20 Comp. & Dem. Track volume 133 of Proc. of Machine Learning Research(Eds:H. J.Escalante K.Hofmann) PMLR Montreal Canada December2021 pp.3–26.
33. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
34. T.Chen C.Guestrin inProc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD San Francisco California USA August2016 pp.785–794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
35. Prokhorenkova L. O. · 2018 · 6639
36. Ke G. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2017 · 30 · 3146
37. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.173510.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
38. J.Chung C.Gulcehre K.Cho Y.Bengio CoRR2014 abs/1412.3555.
39. S. Ö.Arik T.Pfister inP AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. AAAI Press Palo Alto California USA February2021 pp.6679–6687.10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 ↗
40. Gorishniy Y. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2021 · 34 · 18932
41. S.Popov S.Morozov A.Babenko CoRR2019 abs/1909.06312.
42. 10.1007/s11663-023-02782-910.1007/s11663-023-02782-9 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00746-210.1016/S0921-5093(00)00746-2 ↗