journal article·2023-11Open access

Mechano‐Activated Shape Morphing of Aluminum–Plastic Laminate Composites

Chien Nguyen, Karthik Ramalingam, Zachary Kushnir, Fatemeh Rouhani, Sachin S. Velankar

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 22

Abstract

Many “metallized plastic” packaging films bend if stretched and released. Such behavior can be reproduced in laminate composites prepared by bonding aluminum foil to an adhesive polymer sheet. It is shown that such bending occurs because stretching deforms the aluminum layer permanently (i.e., plastically), whereas the polymer layer deforms elastically. Upon releasing, the aluminum–polymer composite then resolves the strain mismatch by bending, with the aluminum on the convex side of the bend. The curvature is found to increase linearly with the applied strain and to reduce as the aluminum thickness increases. The theory of fully elastic bilayers with strain mismatch is in qualitative agreement with the results, but underpredicts the curvatures. It is shown how such bilayers can be patterned with defects such as holes or slits to realize more complex shape morphing, and also how one may achieve bidirectional bending. Such aluminum–polymer‐layered composites provide an inexpensive platform suitable for rapid prototyping of self‐folding origami structures using robust materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA 15261 USA

Department of Chemical Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA 15261 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5SM01004G10.1039/C5SM01004G ↗
2. 10.1039/C9SM00268E10.1039/C9SM00268E ↗
3. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0058810.1021/acsapm.0c00588 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.1c0116610.1021/acsami.1c01166 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.eml.2021.10138410.1016/j.eml.2021.101384 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10401210.1016/j.jmps.2020.104012 ↗
7. 10.1039/C8SM00684A10.1039/C8SM00684A ↗
8. 10.1039/C6SM01823H10.1039/C6SM01823H ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20220330810.1002/adfm.202203308 ↗
10. 10.1002/mame.20220027010.1002/mame.202200270 ↗
11. 10.1002/admt.20220033910.1002/admt.202200339 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aaw250210.1126/science.aaw2502 ↗
13. 10.1002/aisy.20190005910.1002/aisy.201900059 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-02531610.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025316 ↗
15. 10.1002/advs.20200063610.1002/advs.202000636 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mser.2021.10062110.1016/j.mser.2021.100621 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/09400110.1088/0964-1726/23/9/094001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.00410.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.004 ↗
19. 10.1007/s40684-019-00027-210.1007/s40684-019-00027-2 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20210047310.1002/adem.202100473 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.269.5223.52510.1126/science.269.5223.525 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.268.5218.173510.1126/science.268.5218.1735 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20220639310.1002/adma.202206393 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.abn919810.1126/sciadv.abn9198 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.6b0795710.1021/acsami.6b07957 ↗
26. C.Nguyen University of Pittsburgh 2023.
27. 10.1002/pc.2006010.1002/pc.20060 ↗
28. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
29. Freund L. B. · 2003
30. 10.1063/1.12372210.1063/1.123722 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00070-810.1016/S0022-5096(99)00070-8 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20140351010.1002/adma.201403510 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20190300610.1002/adma.201903006 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10754410.1016/j.matdes.2018.107544 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10960510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109605 ↗
36. 10.1177/1045389X22107743510.1177/1045389X221077435 ↗
37. 10.3390/mi1306090710.3390/mi13060907 ↗
38. 10.1557/JMR.1995.120010.1557/JMR.1995.1200 ↗
39. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90081-710.1016/0022-5096(94)90081-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00360-T10.1016/0956-7151(94)00360-T ↗