journal article·2023-10Open access

Low Energy Twist Defects in Pentatwinned Silver Nanowires

Hu Zhao, Chongguang Liu, William W. Sampson, Alexander S. Eggeman, Brian Derby

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 19

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy investigation of networks of pentatwinned silver nanowires has identified the presence of nanoscale defects within individual wires, showing narrow regions of banded contrast normal to the nanowire axis (bamboo faults). Structural analysis using machine learning decomposition of scanning precession electron diffraction data identifies these bamboo faults as a pair of twist boundaries normal to the wire axis creating low energy coincident site lattices between the faulted region and the parent nanowire. This leads to a conservation of the relative misorientation of the twinned structure within the faulted region, leading to an apparent local rotation of the nanowire. Their presence after spraying and nonthermal processing suggests that they may form during nanowire synthesis. However, examination of the networks before and after cyclic straining finds an increase in the density of the defects, indicating that they may also form as a result of mechanical deformation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/B714072J10.1039/B714072J ↗
2. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-7510.1186/1556-276X-6-75 ↗
3. 10.1002/smll.20160258110.1002/smll.201602581 ↗
4. 10.1021/cg301119d10.1021/cg301119d ↗
5. 10.1021/nn900348c10.1021/nn900348c ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20130390610.1002/smll.201303906 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.02.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.02.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.01110.1016/j.eml.2016.02.011 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.109899310.1126/science.1098993 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00339-005-3204-610.1007/s00339-005-3204-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.02310.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.012 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat208510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat237010.1038/nmat2370 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.01610.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.016 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn405941m10.1021/nn405941m ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.04544310.1103/PhysRevB.85.045443 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-6528/aac04610.1088/1361-6528/aac046 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0101510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01015 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14215010.1016/j.msea.2021.142150 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20120052210.1002/smll.201200522 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.05810.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.058 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0648010.1021/acsnano.0c06480 ↗
24. 10.1016/0304-3991(94)90039-610.1016/0304-3991(94)90039-6 ↗
25. Rauch E. F. V. · Microsc. Anal. · 2008 · 22 · 4
26. 10.1524/zkri.2010.120510.1524/zkri.2010.1205 ↗
27. 10.1186/s40679-019-0063-310.1186/s40679-019-0063-3 ↗
28. 10.1111/jmi.1285010.1111/jmi.12850 ↗
29. 10.1038/4456510.1038/44565 ↗
30. 10.1080/1478643700822107510.1080/14786437008221075 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.03910.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.039 ↗
32. 10.1186/s40192-015-0040-110.1186/s40192-015-0040-1 ↗
33. 10.1080/1478643070145532110.1080/14786430701455321 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.00310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.003 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.172123410.1063/1.1721234 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.115961010.1126/science.1159610 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.048 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.028 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.02810.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.028 ↗