Self‐Organization Postprocess for Additive Manufacturing in Producing Advanced Functional Structure and Material
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) is developing rapidly due to its flexibility in producing complex geometries and tailored material compositions. However, AM processes are characterized by intrinsic limitations concerning their resolution and surface finish, which are related to the layer‐by‐layer stacking process. Herein, a self‐organization process is promoted as an approach to improve surface quality and achieve optimization of 3D minimal surface lightweight structures. The self‐organization is activated after the powder bed 3D printing process via local melting, thereby allowing surface tension‐driven viscous flow. The surface roughness Ra (arithmetic average of the roughness profile) could be decreased by a factor of 1000 and transparent lenses and complex gyroid structures could be produced for demonstration. The concept of self‐organization is further elaborated by incorporating external magnetic fields to intentionally manipulate magnetic particles, which are mixed with the polymer before printing and self‐organization. This concept can be applied to develop programmable materials with specific microtextures responding to the external physical conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Interactive and Immersive Displays · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division 5.4 Advanced Multi‐materials Processing Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) 12203 Berlin Germany
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Flaviana C. · 2018 · 13
2. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10161910.1016/j.addma.2020.101619 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3 ↗
4. B.Vasudevarao D. P.Natarajan M.Henderson inInt. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp. University of Texas Austin USA2000.
5. Antonio A. · Rapid Prototyping J. · 2006 · 12 · 1
6. 10.1243/09544054JEM67010.1243/09544054JEM670 ↗
7. Nancharaiah T. · Int. J. Emerg. Technol. · 2010 · 1 · 106
8. 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-001710.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10931410.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109314 ↗
11. Kumbhar N. N. · J. Inst. Eng. (India) · 2018 · 99 · 481
12. 10.1007/s00170-016-9978-110.1007/s00170-016-9978-1 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-018-03391-w10.1038/s41467-018-03391-w ↗
14. 10.1002/admt.20180000310.1002/admt.201800003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.07.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.07.002 ↗
16. 10.1080/1040843049049090510.1080/10408430490490905 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170616410.1002/adma.201706164 ↗
18. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2014-008710.1108/RPJ-07-2014-0087 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.00410.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
21. 10.1088/2631-7990/ab0fa510.1088/2631-7990/ab0fa5 ↗
22. Zhang X. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11
23. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.00110.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗