In Silico Evaluation of Bilinear Elastoplastic Coronary Artery Stents
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical responses of the endovascular stent determine the arterial homeostasis and vulnerability of the atherosclerotic plaque. Given the various plaque components when the stent is deployed, the stent may apply excessive stress to the lesion and cause plaque rupture. Herein, using the interaction between the Palmaz–Schatz stent with two stent biomaterials, stainless steel, and magnesium alloy, and three different types of plaque, namely hypocellular, hypercellular, and calcified, are studied. An implicit finite element method is used to simulate and analyze the stress and strain acting on the stents, artery, and plaques. The Mooney–Rivlin hyperelastic material model is considered to study the responses of each component. The results reveal that stainless‐steel stents applied a higher level of stress to the plaques and vessel wall, which may lead to vascular damage and plaque rupture. However, a magnesium alloy stent with the similar design and geometrical parameters generates less stress on the plaque and artery. Interestingly, a minor improvement in magnesium alloy stents, increasing the strut thickness, can enhance the stent performance and lower the applied stresses to the vasculature and plaque, making them an ideal choice of material for stenting applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Biomedical Engineering Department of Life Science Engineering Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies University of Tehran North Kargar Street 1439957131 Tehran Iran
Department of Biomedical Engineering Florida International University Miami FL 33174 USA
School of Biomedical Engineering The University of British Columbia Vancouver BC V6T1Z3 Canada
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.09.01710.1016/j.tcm.2018.09.017 ↗
3. 10.3389/fcvm.2017.0007810.3389/fcvm.2017.00078 ↗
4. 10.1161/01.ATV.18.7.113210.1161/01.ATV.18.7.1132 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.09610.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.096 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11883-016-0601-610.1007/s11883-016-0601-6 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat451910.1038/nmat4519 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.00510.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.005 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.22310.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.223 ↗
10. 10.2217/nnm.16.310.2217/nnm.16.3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.56710.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.567 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1208178410.3390/polym12081784 ↗
13. 10.1002/adhm.20150101910.1002/adhm.201501019 ↗
14. 10.5830/CVJA-2017-03610.5830/CVJA-2017-036 ↗
15. 10.1080/10255842.2020.176396710.1080/10255842.2020.1763967 ↗
16. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0036610.3389/fbioe.2019.00366 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11964110.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119641 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep4634310.1038/srep46343 ↗
19. Tambaca J. · Tex. Heart Inst. J. · 2011 · 38 · 491
20. X. Z.Wang S. H.Masood S. H.Riza H.Modi inIOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering IOP Publishing Bristol UK2020 p.012067.10.1088/1757-899X/715/1/012067 ↗
21. 10.1186/s12938-015-0119-010.1186/s12938-015-0119-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10450010.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104500 ↗
23. Li H. · Biomed. Eng. Online · 2016 · 15 · 275
24. 10.1016/B978-1-927885-25-3.50007-010.1016/B978-1-927885-25-3.50007-0 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11012-019-00989-210.1007/s11012-019-00989-2 ↗
26. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.0006910.3389/fcvm.2020.00069 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pone.022402610.1371/journal.pone.0224026 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.00510.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.005 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10439-017-1851-310.1007/s10439-017-1851-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.11008910.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110089 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11949310.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119493 ↗
32. 10.1186/s40759-014-0002-x10.1186/s40759-014-0002-x ↗
33. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy33010.1093/eurheartj/ehy330 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11941410.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119414 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.03410.1016/j.msec.2016.12.034 ↗
36. 10.14740/jocmr3024w10.14740/jocmr3024w ↗
37. 10.1098/rsif.2019.031310.1098/rsif.2019.0313 ↗
38. 10.1017/jmech.2018.2310.1017/jmech.2018.23 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.04.00710.1016/j.jcmg.2008.04.007 ↗
40. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu35310.1093/eurheartj/ehu353 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.02310.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.023 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10434610.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104346 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10237-018-1066-z10.1007/s10237-018-1066-z ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10430510.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104305 ↗
45. 10.1080/10255842.2020.182282310.1080/10255842.2020.1822823 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11517-009-0432-510.1007/s11517-009-0432-5 ↗
47. 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60015-310.1016/S1051-0443(07)60015-3 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.10410.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.104 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.10.00410.1016/j.ejvs.2016.10.004 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.02.01410.1016/j.jvscit.2020.02.014 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10345310.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103453 ↗