journal article·2014-04

Dislocation Evolution in Nanograins during Successive Stress Relaxation

Guoyong Wang, Jianshe Lian

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 16· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Whether low strain hardening is an intrinsic behavior of nc metals is still an open question. To make clear this issue, in this paper repeated stress relaxation experiments were performed on a nanocrystalline and coarse‐grained copper, respectively. The mobile dislocation density during plastic strain, which directly determines the performance of strain hardening, was deduced from this experiment. The mobile dislocation density of nanocrystalline copper decreased much slower than coarse‐grained copper. The high mobility of the dislocation in nanocrystalline copper indicate the dislocation seldom interact with each other and generate sessile barrier, and render the nanocrystalline copper a more diminutive strain‐hardening capacity than coarse‐grained copper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials Department of Materials Science and Engineering Jilin University No. 5988 Renmin Street Changchun 130025 P. R. China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.108663610.1126/science.1086636 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.2008.028010.1557/JMR.2008.0280 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.287.5457.146310.1126/science.287.5457.1463 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.108104210.1126/science.1081042 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.122821110.1126/science.1228211 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.115644610.1126/science.1156446 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat113610.1038/nmat1136 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat103510.1038/nmat1035 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.25550110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.255501 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.177934210.1063/1.1779342 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.20550410.1103/PhysRevLett.103.205504 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13550110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.135501 ↗
14. Caillard D. · 2003
15. 10.1016/S0966-9795(00)00047-910.1016/S0966-9795(00)00047-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)09630-F10.1016/0921-5093(94)09630-F ↗
17. 10.1063/1.194689910.1063/1.1946899 ↗
18. 10.1016/0921-5093(93)90339-G10.1016/0921-5093(93)90339-G ↗
19. 10.1063/1.299937910.1063/1.2999379 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.109290510.1126/science.1092905 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.116764110.1126/science.1167641 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.02410110.1103/PhysRevB.66.024101 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.324758310.1063/1.3247583 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.022 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.16510.1016/j.msea.2006.07.165 ↗
26. 10.1016/1359-6454(96)00073-010.1016/1359-6454(96)00073-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6462(96)00381-810.1016/S1359-6462(96)00381-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.00510.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.03110.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.031 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.05510.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.055 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.161837010.1063/1.1618370 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.21410.1016/j.msea.2003.10.214 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.01810.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.018 ↗
34. R. K.Guduru K. L.Murty K. M.Youssef R. O.Scattergood C. C.Koch in Symposium on Processing and Mechanical Response of Engineering Materials held at the 2006 TMS Annual Meeting San Antonio TX2006 pp.14.10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.165 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.04710.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗