Indentation Pop‐in Behavior of CoCrFeNiAlx High‐Entropy Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Indentation pop‐in behavior of CoCrFeNiAl0.1, CoCrFeNiAl0.3, and CoCrFeNiAl0.6 high‐entropy alloys (HEAs) at different loading rates is investigated using instrumental nanoindentation. Experimental results show that the increase in either loading rate or the aluminum atomic content (Alx) of the alloy all have a reducing effect on the pop‐in behavior on the load–displacement curve. Meanwhile, both conditions exert a lagging effect on the triggered depth of the first pop‐in event and significantly affect the bursting width. The first pop‐in event is characterized using the previous phenomenological model and the effects of loading rate and Alx are quantitatively analyzed through combining the elastic deformation energy prior to the first pop‐in and the energy dissipation during the indentation process. In addition, the activation volumes for pop‐in event are evaluated to be about 4–13 Ω much higher than that in pure metal, revealing the multiatom‐coordinated migration process in HEAs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Applied Mechanics College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering Taiyuan University of Technology Taiyuan 030024 China
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Material Strength and Structural Impact Taiyuan University of Technology Taiyuan 030024 China
College of Biomedical Engineering Taiyuan University of Technology Taiyuan 030024 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.07510.1016/j.msea.2017.05.075 ↗
2. 10.3390/met1008110110.3390/met10081101 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.172282410.1063/1.1722824 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.369358610.1063/1.3693586 ↗
5. 10.1016/0956-716X(95)00013-L10.1016/0956-716X(95)00013-L ↗
6. 10.3390/app1011389210.3390/app10113892 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.11.01910.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.11.019 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00339-019-2894-010.1007/s00339-019-2894-0 ↗
9. 10.1080/21663831.2014.91269010.1080/21663831.2014.912690 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.125458110.1126/science.1254581 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20030056710.1002/adem.200300567 ↗
12. Pi J. H. · Adv. Mater. Ind. · 2009 · 9 · 71
13. 10.1038/s41467-018-06600-810.1038/s41467-018-06600-8 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep1699710.1038/srep16997 ↗
15. 10.1088/0370-1298/62/1/30810.1088/0370-1298/62/1/308 ↗
16. Herman H. · 2017
17. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.01110.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.011 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.06.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.06.022 ↗
19. L. M.Surhone M. T.Timpledon S. F.Marseken Solid Solution Strengthening Betascript UK2010.
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.05410210.1103/PhysRevB.73.054102 ↗
21. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab611510.1088/2053-1591/ab6115 ↗
22. Johnson K. L. · 1987
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.11310.1016/j.msea.2014.06.113 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10398510.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103985 ↗
25. 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-510.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 ↗
26. Tabor D. · 1951
27. 10.1002/adem.20180074410.1002/adem.201800744 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.03610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.036 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11837-015-1580-810.1007/s11837-015-1580-8 ↗
30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000628)76:14<2062::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000628)76:14<2062::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.04.04110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.04.041 ↗
32. Pi J. H. · Rare Met. Mater. Eng. · 2019 · 48 · 0744
33. 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.05.01810.1016/j.intermet.2014.05.018 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.00210.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.002 ↗