journal article·2022-10Open access

Approaching the Limits of Aspect Ratio in Free‐Standing Al2O3 3D Shell Structures

Stephanie Burgmann, Markus Lid, Settasit Chaikasetsin, Dag Skjerven Bjordal, Fritz Prinz, John Provine, Filippo Berto, Antonius T. J. van Helvoort, Jan Torgersen

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 24· Issue 10

Abstract

Nanoscale free‐standing membranes are used for a variety of sensors and other micro/nano‐electro‐mechanical systems devices. To tune performance, it is indispensable to understand the limits of aspect ratios achievable. Herein, vapor hydrofluoric (VHF) processes are employed to release 3D shell structures made of atomic‐layer‐deposited Al2O3 etch‐stop layers. Structure heights of 100–600 nm and widths of 1–200 nm are fabricated for membranes with 20 and 50 nm thickness. Undercut depths of and aspect ratios of 475:1 etch depth to structure width (50 nm films) and etch depth to membrane thicknesses of 495:0.02 (20 nm films) are achieved. The etch‐rate stagnates above a ratio of 31% hydrofluoric (HF), where decreasing EtOH shares reduce reproducibility. Etch rates reach 0.75 mm min−1 and are generally constant over vapor etch depth. For 100 nm heights and widths of , etch rates however stagnate for deeper depths. All explored structures remained stable with widths up to 5 μm independent of the height. Above width, top membranes deflect, likely from stress accumulated during deposition. Herein, exploring and understanding the limits of aspect ratio in future free‐standing membrane devices are helped.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering NTNU Trondheim Norway

Department of Mechanical Engineering Stanford University Stanford CA USA

Aligned Carbon (Santa Clara, CA) and Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University

Department of Physics NTNU Trondheim Norway

Institute for Materials Science Technical University of Munich 85748 Garching b. München Germany

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Goossen L. · Proceedings · 2018 · 2 · 13
2. 10.1017/S143192761201441910.1017/S1431927612014419 ↗
3. 10.1017/S143192761200124910.1017/S1431927612001249 ↗
4. 10.1116/1.482024010.1116/1.4820240 ↗
5. Esashi M. · 2021 · 377
6. M.Winterkorn A.Dadlani Y.Kim J.Provine F.Prinz in2015 Transducers – 2015 18th Inter. Conf. on Solid-State Sensors Actuators and Microsystems Tranducers2015 pp.2272–2275.10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2015.7181415 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.07.00510.1016/j.mee.2009.07.005 ↗
8. 10.1116/1.279407410.1116/1.2794074 ↗
9. Witvrouw A. · Proc. SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2000 · 4174
10. 10.1109/JMEMS.2016.253326710.1109/JMEMS.2016.2533267 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.04.00310.1016/j.ultramic.2016.04.003 ↗
12. Winterkorn M. M. · 2019
13. 10.1088/0960-1317/7/1/00110.1088/0960-1317/7/1/001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.67410.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.674 ↗
15. 10.1149/06102.0395ecst10.1149/06102.0395ecst ↗
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.187.4510.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.187.45 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sna.2004.10.03310.1016/j.sna.2004.10.033 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.sna.2020.11245610.1016/j.sna.2020.112456 ↗
19. Berdova M. · 2015
20. A. A.Dedkova P. Y.Glagolev G. D.Demin E. E.Gusev P. A.Skvortsov inIEEE Conf. of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus) IEEE Piscataway NJ2020 pp.2288–2292.10.1109/EIConRus49466.2020.9039289 ↗
21. M.Sterner G.Stemme J.Oberhammer inIEEE 5th Inter. Conf. on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems IEEE Piscataway NJ2010 pp.959–962.10.1109/NEMS.2010.5592249 ↗
22. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/9/09501910.1088/0960-1317/23/9/095019 ↗
23. Yang J. · 2001 · 136610.1007/978-3-642-59497-7_322 ↗
24. S.Yoneoka M.Liger G.Yama R.Schuster F.Purkl J.Provine F. B.Prinz R. T.Howe T. W.Kenny inIEEE 24th Inter. Conf. on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems IEEE Piscataway NJ2011 pp.676–679.10.1109/MEMSYS.2011.5734515 ↗
25. 10.1088/0960-1317/12/3/31610.1088/0960-1317/12/3/316 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01628-210.1016/S0924-4247(97)01628-2 ↗
27. Kshirsagar A. A. P. · Int. J. Eng. · 2017 · 10 · 162
28. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10861910.1016/j.tws.2021.108619 ↗
29. Lakhtakia A. · 2013
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.17010.1016/j.cej.2017.10.170 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mser.2003.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2003.10.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.08410.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.084 ↗
33. Lim H. E. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 1
34. 10.1016/j.mee.2019.11119210.1016/j.mee.2019.111192 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.02910.1016/j.sna.2006.01.029 ↗
36. Bakke T. · Micromech. Eur. · 2005 · 122 · 68
37. 10.1109/JMEMS.2018.286728210.1109/JMEMS.2018.2867282 ↗
38. Vestyck D. · 2022
39. “uEtchHF VaporRelease System” Equipment Manual Marvell Nanofabrication Laboratory UC Berkely https://nanolab.berkeley.edu/public/manuals/equipment_manual.shtml(accessed: April 2022).
40. SPTS Technologies · 2012
41. Thomas T. K. · AIChE J. · 1976 · 22 · 620
42. 10.1002/pol.1955.12017831110.1002/pol.1955.120178311 ↗
43. 10.1021/cm030454610.1021/cm0304546 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.11210.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.112 ↗
45. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00286-410.1016/S1359-6454(99)00286-4 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-0-387-22462-6_1010.1007/978-0-387-22462-6_10 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.142507610.1063/1.1425076 ↗
48. J.BeuthJr. Int. J. Solids Struct.1992 29 1657.10.1016/0020-7683(92)90015-L ↗