journal article·2023-04

Rapid and Full Densification of Carbonized Polymer Dot/Copper Composites by Low‐Temperature Sintering

Wenmin Zhao, Rui Bao, Jianhong Yi, Shaoyong Huang

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

To accomplish densification, pure copper (Cu) sintering, which is a solid phase sintering, necessitates extremely high pressure and temperature. The inclusion of an activator can speed up the diffusion of copper atoms, allowing the densification process to proceed more quickly. The carbonized polymer dot (CPD) via ball milling and spark plasma sintering to obtain a composite with full densification at low temperatures. Effects of sintering temperature on interface of CPD–Cu and the impact of CPD as an activator on pure Cu sintering densification are investigated in this study. Following are the results: Cu matrix composites can be densified at low temperatures by adding CPD, CPD/Cu composites have a relative density of 99.4%, and a hardness up to 130.94 HV while sintering temperature is just 550 °C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Materials Metallurgy and Chemistry Jiangxi University of Science and Technology Ganzhou 341000 China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming 650093 China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.01010.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.010 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1003-6326(20)65216-510.1016/S1003-6326(20)65216-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10061910.1016/j.coco.2020.100619 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.02910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.04810.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.048 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.29710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.297 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.09510.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.095 ↗
8. 10.1021/am400480k10.1021/am400480k ↗
9. 10.1039/D0SC05743F10.1039/D0SC05743F ↗
10. 10.1039/D0SC01605E10.1039/D0SC01605E ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.8b0605110.1021/jacs.8b06051 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12274-020-2965-810.1007/s12274-020-2965-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.01710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.017 ↗
14. Kaysser W.A. · 1987 · 12110.1007/978-1-4613-2851-3_12 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-021-06116-510.1007/s10853-021-06116-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.05510.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.055 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170291010.1002/adma.201702910 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6TC03027K10.1039/C6TC03027K ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.06.01710.1016/j.matchar.2019.06.017 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1TC01057C10.1039/D1TC01057C ↗
21. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab319d10.1088/2053-1591/ab319d ↗
22. 10.1016/S1003-6326(20)65270-010.1016/S1003-6326(20)65270-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14057310.1016/j.msea.2020.140573 ↗
24. Wakker R. F. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1955 · 38 · 18710.1111/j.1151-2916.1955.tb14928.x ↗
25. Blendell J. E. · 2020 · 249
26. Joo H. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 28 · 200
27. 10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60087-910.1016/S1002-0721(14)60087-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.02510.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.025 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp804413a10.1021/jp804413a ↗
30. 10.1021/ef00015a02010.1021/ef00015a020 ↗
31. Milsom B. · 2013