Buckling‐Pattern‐Based Characterization of Stiff Membrane on Soft Film
Source abstract
Abstract
Stiff and soft bilayer systems are commonly used in industrial and biological applications. A classical stiff/soft bilayer film is an oxygen‐plasma‐treated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) film. After treatment, the PDMS film surface is oxidized, and then the stiff oxide surface layer and residual soft PDMS layer jointly constitute bilayer films, which are crucial materials in the fields of flexible electronics and buckling behavior studies. However, the oxidized surface layer is not properly recognized because of the complexity of the oxidization transition induced by the oxygen plasma. Here, its atomic composition and ratio are experimentally determined. A calculation approach to calculate its thickness and modulus based on the buckling behaviors of bilayer films is proposed. An accurate modulus of the oxide layer, 34.6 GPa, is obtained. Furthermore, this method can be used to characterize various stiff films in bilayer systems, which shows great potential for applications in many fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory for Intelligent Nano Materials and Devices of the Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing 210016 China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents · Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adom.20180101710.1002/adom.201801017 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.07.01310.1016/j.apmt.2019.07.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00039-210.1016/S0032-3861(00)00039-2 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.112140110.1126/science.1121401 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat283410.1038/nmat2834 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.12210.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.122 ↗
7. 10.1049/mnl.2017.023010.1049/mnl.2017.0230 ↗
8. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6610.1038/natrevmats.2017.66 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphys180610.1038/nphys1806 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.493974110.1063/1.4939741 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.00910.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.009 ↗
12. 10.1021/la903154y10.1021/la903154y ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.2008.002910.1557/JMR.2008.0029 ↗
14. 10.1039/C8SM01654B10.1039/C8SM01654B ↗
15. 10.1002/adom.20170042510.1002/adom.201700425 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.04210.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.042 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.eml.2015.04.00610.1016/j.eml.2015.04.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.04.01610.1016/j.jmps.2015.04.016 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep0888710.1038/srep08887 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eml.2015.10.00510.1016/j.eml.2015.10.005 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8SM01345D10.1039/C8SM01345D ↗
23. 10.1126/science.115406910.1126/science.1154069 ↗
24. 10.1038/nmat314410.1038/nmat3144 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.028 ↗
26. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1212340/v110.21203/rs.3.rs-1212340/v1 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.070292710410.1073/pnas.0702927104 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.192986910.1063/1.1929869 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.12430110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.124301 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.07430210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.074302 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.18830210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.188302 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.03.00710.1016/j.jmps.2005.03.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cap.2008.08.04810.1016/j.cap.2008.08.048 ↗