Effect of Scanning Strategies on Grain Structure and Texture of Additively Manufactured Lattice Struts: A Numerical Exploration
Source abstract
Abstract
Electron beam powder bed fusion (PBF‐EB) is a promising technology for fabricating complex parts with near‐net‐shape precision. Moreover, PBF‐EB offers a unique opportunity to tailor the microstructure, thereby tuning local mechanical properties. Numerical simulation has emerged as a powerful tool for predicting the evolution of texture and grain structure during PBF‐EB. Herein, the in‐house developed and experimentally validated simulation software, , is employed to investigate the impact of scanning strategy on the texture and grain structure of CMSX‐4 in PBF‐EB‐processed thin tilted lattice struts, commonly found in cellular structures. The core of consists of a finite difference solver for temperature field computation and a cellular automaton model for simulating grain structure evolution. Nine distinct scanning strategies are systematically explored. The resulting texture and grain structures are meticulously compared and comprehensively discussed. Notably, the contour scanning strategy yields distinctive texture and grain structures compared to other explored scanning strategies. This study highlights the capability of in assisting microstructure customization in the PBF‐EB process, and advances the understanding of the relationship between PBF‐EB scanning strategy and resulting microstructure in tilted lattice struts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Materials Science and Engineering for Metals (WTM) Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg (FAU) Martensstraße 5 91058 Erlangen Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. Choudhari C. J. · 2021 · 45
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.51110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.511 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.01310.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.79610.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.796 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00170-019-04085-310.1007/s00170-019-04085-3 ↗
7. C.Körner H.Helmer A.Bauereiß R. F.Singer inMATEC Web Conf. EDP Sciences Giens France2014 p.08001.10.1051/matecconf/20141408001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.04610.1016/j.msea.2016.05.046 ↗
9. 10.3390/met703009110.3390/met7030091 ↗
10. 10.3390/met1006081410.3390/met10060814 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.07110.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.071 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.403730510.1115/1.4037305 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10104110.1016/j.addma.2020.101041 ↗
14. 10.1002/adem.20200061110.1002/adem.202000611 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15507110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155071 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00466-017-1516-y10.1007/s00466-017-1516-y ↗
17. Z.Yang Y.Kuesters R.Logvinov M.Markl C.Körner inIVth Int. Conf. on Simulation Additive Manufacturing SIM‐AM 2023 CIMNE Scipedia Munich Germany2023.
18. 10.3390/cryst1402014910.3390/cryst14020149 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.03010.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.030 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.00410.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.004 ↗
21. Carslaw H. S. · 1986
22. 10.1007/978-3-540-71584-910.1007/978-3-540-71584-9 ↗
23. 10.1017/CBO978051199556910.1017/CBO9780511995569 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.325066810.1115/1.3250668 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-810.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 ↗
26. 10.1364/AO.23.00003010.1364/AO.23.000030 ↗
27. A.Klassen Doctoral Thesis Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany2018.
28. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00303-510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00303-5 ↗
29. 10.1002/adem.20220168210.1002/adem.202201682 ↗
30. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00433-510.1016/1359-6454(95)00433-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.12510.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.125 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11169210.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111692 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10767210.1016/j.matdes.2019.107672 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10228410.1016/j.addma.2021.102284 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.02410.1016/j.addma.2019.06.024 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.12279810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122798 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11693010.1016/j.actamat.2021.116930 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11272110.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112721 ↗
39. Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität‐Erlangen‐Nürnberg Fritz Parallel Cluster https://hpc.fau.de/systems‐services/documentation‐instructions/clusters/fritz‐cluster/ (accessed:2023).
40. Hoffmann K. A. · 2000
41. 10.1533/978184569014410.1533/9781845690144 ↗
42. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11661-015-3300-y10.1007/s11661-015-3300-y ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14467010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144670 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.05310.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.053 ↗