Thermal Shock Resistance of a Two‐Dimensional Silicon Carbon Fiber Reinforced SiC Matrix Composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The 2D-SiC/SiC composite has higher ability to resist the thermal shock in 0° direction with higher fiber volume fraction, compared with 90° specimen. The greater degradation in the mechanical properties for the 90° specimen suggests more serious damage in the 90° fiber bundles. The damage caused by the thermal shock involves matrix cracking, debonding, and oxidization of fiber/matrix interface. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Science and Technology on Thermostructural Composite Material Laboratory, No. 547 Postbox Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi′an 710072 China
School of Materials Science and Engineering Xi'an Shiyou University Xi'an 710065 China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.00710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.007 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20050026910.1002/adem.200500269 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20029000110.1002/adem.200290001 ↗
4. 10.1179/09506609479015103510.1179/095066094790151035 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:101863980997110.1023/A:1018639809971 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00356-X10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00356-X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.017 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:100467513276710.1023/A:1004675132767 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.016 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08719.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08719.x ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-007-2314-210.1007/s10853-007-2314-2 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01408.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01408.x ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08424.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08424.x ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02696.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02696.x ↗
15. Filipuzzi L. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 77 · 45
16. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02868.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02868.x ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07996.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07996.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.00910.1016/j.msea.2011.01.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00292-810.1016/1359-6454(95)00292-8 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00961.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00961.x ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0115125010.1007/BF01151250 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)00949-210.1016/S0022-3115(02)00949-2 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05201.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05201.x ↗
24. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00005-510.1016/S0266-3538(97)00005-5 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-006-6594-810.1007/s10853-006-6594-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.004 ↗
27. Kubaschewski O. · 1993
28. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08724.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08724.x ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02060.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02060.x ↗
30. 10.1002/adem.20050009210.1002/adem.200500092 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00028-610.1016/S0955-2219(02)00028-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.016 ↗