Influence of Gradient Residual Stress and Tip Shape on Stress Fields Inside Indented TiN Hard Coating
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoindentation of treated surfaces, thin films, and coatings is often used as a simple method to measure their hardness and stiffness. These quantities are technologically highly relevant and allow to qualitatively compare different material and surface treatments but fail to capture the entire extent of the highly complex mechanical interaction between indenter tip and the tested surface. Many studies have addressed this question by analytical or numerical modeling, but they must rely on verification by recalculating indentation curves or ex situ microscopy of surface deformation postexperiment. Herein, results from in situ measurements of the multiaxial stress distributions forming beneath an indenter tip while the tested sample is still under load are presented. A 9 μm‐thick TiN hard coating is tested in 1) as‐deposited state and 2) shot‐peened by Al2O3 particles, using two diamond wedges as indenter tips, with 60° and 143° opening angle, respectively. The results reveal a strong influence of the tip shape on the deformation behavior and the main stress component developing inside the sample while under load. In addition, a crack‐closing effect can be attributed to the exponentially declining near‐surface compressive residual stress gradient that is present in the shot‐peened sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Materials Physics Montanuniversität Leoben Jahnstraße 12 8700 Leoben Austria
Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science Austrian Academy of Sciences Jahnstraße 12 8700 Leoben Austria
Institute of Materials Research Helmholtz Zentrum Hereon c/o DESY Notkestraße 85 22607 Hamburg Germany
Funding
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.11.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2017.11.006 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1089-3156(01)00012-510.1016/S1089-3156(01)00012-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.03310.1016/j.tsf.2003.10.033 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.01910.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.02710.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.027 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.03410.1016/j.msea.2014.09.034 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.07.00310.1016/j.jmps.2005.07.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.04610.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.046 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep2267010.1038/srep22670 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10847810.1016/j.matdes.2020.108478 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.05610.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.056 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.01110.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00069-810.1016/S0921-5093(03)00069-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.00810.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.028 ↗
16. 10.3390/qubs204002010.3390/qubs2040020 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20100029910.1002/adem.201000299 ↗
18. 10.1107/S160057671500430610.1107/S1600576715004306 ↗