Relationships between Microstructural and Mechanical Performance on Example of an Air‐Hardening Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Because of an excellent combination of strength and ductility, mono‐phase low‐alloyed steels with a bimodal grain size are an appropriate alternative to conventionally cold‐rolled and annealed steels as well as to steels with a dual‐phase microstructure. This study investigates how the microstructure of a low‐alloyed air‐hardening steel either with a homogeneous, a dual‐phase, or a bimodal grain structure influences its mechanical and fatigue performances. The homogeneous ferritic grain microstructure of the steel sheets is adjusted by an intercritical annealing at 790 °C, along with subsequent air hardening to obtain a dual‐phase state. Then, the ferritic‐martensitic material is cold‐rolled and annealed at 550–700 °C to produce different bimodal grain microstructures. The evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties are characterized. An annealing temperature of 600 °C is considered to be the optimal temperature resulting in pronounced bimodal grain size distribution. The sheet with a bimodal microstructure exhibits a higher strength and equal ductility compared to one with a homogeneous ferritic microstructure. Additionally, high‐cycle fatigue tests of the material with a bimodal microstructure shows its superior fatigue behavior at a loading of above 800 000 cycles compared with both the homogeneous ferritic microstructure as well as the dual‐phase microstructure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science Paderborn University 33098 Paderborn Germany
Department of Metal Forming National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine 49600 Dnipro Ukraine
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Friedrich H. E. · 2013 · 85510.1007/978-3-8348-2110-2 ↗
2. 10.1002/srin.20130042010.1002/srin.201300420 ↗
3. 10.1002/srin.20160010710.1002/srin.201600107 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0322299110.1007/BF03222991 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1105076110.3390/ma11050761 ↗
6. Altan T. · 2012 · 450
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.04110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.041 ↗
8. 10.1002/srin.20050598810.1002/srin.200505988 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.03810.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.41210.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.412 ↗
11. 10.1038/nature0113310.1038/nature01133 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.02610.1016/j.msea.2007.09.026 ↗
13. 10.3390/met708031610.3390/met7080316 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.11.01810.1016/j.jmst.2017.11.018 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.08.03510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.08.035 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.07010.1016/j.msea.2014.11.070 ↗
17. 10.1002/srin.20150029410.1002/srin.201500294 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.06110.1016/j.msea.2012.12.061 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11661-012-1556-z10.1007/s11661-012-1556-z ↗
20. 10.1002/srin.20080619210.1002/srin.200806192 ↗
21. 10.3139/105.11017410.3139/105.110174 ↗
22. Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH · 2017 · 2
23. 10.1007/BF0335455310.1007/BF03354553 ↗
24. Hall E. O. · 1970 · 31110.1007/978-1-4684-1860-6 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0264663010.1007/BF02646630 ↗
26. 10.1179/1743284714Y.000000066010.1179/1743284714Y.0000000660 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0264243610.1007/BF02642436 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0264287510.1007/BF02642875 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11665-017-2849-610.1007/s11665-017-2849-6 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.26310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.263 ↗
31. 10.1111/ffe.1249110.1111/ffe.12491 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.04.05510.1016/j.msea.2004.04.055 ↗
33. Gridnev V. · 1973 · 337
34. Fonstein N. · 2015 · 41510.1007/978-3-319-19165-2 ↗