Deformation Responses and Fracture Behaviors of AA6061 under Different Stress Triaxialities
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the deformation responses and fracture behaviors of AA6061 under different stress triaxiality. Specimens of specific shapes and sizes are designed to achieve different stress triaxialities. Mechanical experiments and scanning electron microscopy analyses are performed to capture the mechanical behaviors and failure features of each specimen. Results show that thicker specimens deform more evenly in thickness than thinner specimens but exhibit slightly more brittleness, while the opposite is true for the notch radius of the specimens. Therefore, these two factors can be applied to the design of specimens for specific testing requirements. The failure mechanism is sensitive to the geometrical factors of the specimen. In addition, the distribution of failure features on the fracture surface is found to play a dominant role in the change in mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering Taiyuan University of Technology Taiyuan 030024 China
College of Aeronautics and Astronautics Taiyuan University of Technology Taiyuan 030024 China
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510641 China
Postdoctoral Mobile Station Shanxi Construction Investment Group Co., Ltd. Taiyuan 030032 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20190051010.1002/adem.201900510 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00493-X10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00493-X ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20200073010.1002/adem.202000730 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.10510.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.105 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.16810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.168 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.09.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.09.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10947010.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109470 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14097810.1016/j.msea.2021.140978 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.15910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.159 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.01210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.012 ↗
12. 10.1051/epjconf/20181830201710.1051/epjconf/201818302017 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-710.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10720110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107201 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.01810.1016/j.cja.2020.09.018 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10325810.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103258 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10819010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108190 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11326010.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113260 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.10.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2017.10.012 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11704410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117044 ↗
24. Nagasai B. P. · Mater. Today: Proc. · 2023
25. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.07.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2010.07.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10714610.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107146 ↗