Correlations on Average Tensile Strength of 3D‐Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, Polylactic Acid, and Polylactic Acid + Carbon Fiber Specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
In view of reducing development and production costs of components in the fields such as automobile, aviation, sports, and biomedical, additive manufacturing (AM) holds immense utility. Herein, three samples of 3D‐printed material specimens namely acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA) and polylactic acid + carbon fiber (PLA + CF) are fabricated at 0°, 45°, and 90° orientations using fused deposition modeling (FDM) and subsequently their mechanical properties are evaluated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images are presented to observe the failure behavior. The uncertainty analysis performed on measured and obtained parameters reveals the maximum error of ±0.312% and ±0.3218%, respectively. From the obtained experimental results, correlations on average tensile strength in terms of elastic modulus, percent strain, standard deviation, and printing orientations are presented for each of the materials. ABS and PLA + CF specimens show the agreement of co‐relational with experimental data which lies within ±10% whereas ±3% for PLA specimens. Although on reinforcing with CF, the strength of PLA + CF samples increases considerably at all orientations as compared to PLA and ABS, virgin PLA reported greater elastic modulus as compared with PLA + CF, therefore virgin PLA finds better utilization wherever stiffness is the key requirement in design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Vaishnavi Institute of Technology & Science Bhopal MP 462046 India
Department of Mechanical Engineering Sagar Institute of Science and Technology Bhopal MP 462036 India
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2018-008710.1108/RPJ-04-2018-0087 ↗
2. Huang B. · Polym. Eng. Sci. Polymer · 2019 · 59 · 1208
3. Attoye S. · Mech. Addit. Adv. Manuf. · 2018 · 8 · 3541
4. 10.3390/ma1108133310.3390/ma11081333 ↗
5. Fu S. Y. · Composites, Part A · 1998 · 29 · 57583
6. 10.1108/RPJ-11-2016-019710.1108/RPJ-11-2016-0197 ↗
7. Tekinalpa H. L. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 105 · 144150
8. 10.3390/ma1112252110.3390/ma11122521 ↗
9. Morales N. G. · Addit. Manuf. · 2018 · 24 · 2438
10. Kerekes T. W. · Addit. Manuf. · 2019 · 25 · 53244
11. 10.1007/s00170-020-05849-y10.1007/s00170-020-05849-y ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10734110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.05010.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.050 ↗
14. Abbott A. C. · Addit. Manuf. · 2018 · 19 · 2938
15. 10.1007/s42452-019-1817-110.1007/s42452-019-1817-1 ↗
16. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab551b10.1088/2053-1591/ab551b ↗
17. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-032110.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0321 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10973-021-10656-y10.1007/s10973-021-10656-y ↗
19. Compton B. G. · Addit. Manuf. · 2017 · 17 · 7786
20. 10.1039/C5RA25561A10.1039/C5RA25561A ↗
21. Kuo C. C. · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 89 · 635642
22. 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-001710.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017 ↗
23. Torrado A. R. · Addit. Manuf. · 2015 · 6 · 1629
24. 10.1007/s40964-020-00142-610.1007/s40964-020-00142-6 ↗
25. Altan M. · Mater. Test. · 2017 · 60 · 4717
26. Anderson I. · 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. · 2017 · 4 · 1105
27. 10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y ↗
28. Fayazbakhsh K. · Mater. Today Commun. · 2019 · 18 · 1408
29. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.02910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.029 ↗
30. Wang S. · Plast. Rubber Compos. · 2018 · 47 · 916
31. 10.3390/ma1308192410.3390/ma13081924 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199831878193810.1177/0021998318781938 ↗
33. 10.1007/s40964-020-00145-310.1007/s40964-020-00145-3 ↗
34. 10.1177/089270571984724410.1177/0892705719847244 ↗
35. Luo H. · J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. · 2019 · 12 · 3529
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11147610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 ↗
37. Li Y. · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2018 · 27 · 492500
38. Rajendra P. P. · Recent Pat. Regener. Med. · 2014 · 4 · 4051
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11059510.1016/j.msec.2019.110595 ↗
40. 10.3390/polym1309149910.3390/polym13091499 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2585010.1002/pc.25850 ↗
43. Tanikella N. G. · Addit. Manuf. · 2017 · 15 · 4047
44. Blok L. G. · Addit. Manuf. · 2018 · 22 · 176186
45. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.07410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.074 ↗
46. 10.1177/0954406221102112010.1177/09544062211021120 ↗
47. Maqsood N. · Compos. Part · 2021 · 4 · 100112
48. Kline S. J. · Mech. Eng. · 1953 · 75 · 38