journal article·2022-06Open access

In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of the Corrosion Processes at the Buried Interface of an Epoxy‐like Model Organic Film and AA2024‐T3 Aluminum Alloy

Ahed Almalla, Ozlem Ozcan, Julia Witt

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 24· Issue 6

Abstract

The application of characterization methods with high spatial resolution to the analysis of buried coating/metal interfaces requires the design and use of model systems. Herein, an epoxy‐like thin film is used as a model coating resembling the epoxy‐based coatings and adhesives widely used in technical applications. Spin coating is used for the deposition of a 30 nm‐thin bilayer (BL) composed of poly‐(ethylenimine) (PEI) and poly[(o‐cresyl glycidyl ether)‐co‐formaldehyde] (CNER). Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results confirm that the exposure of coated AA2024‐T3 (AA) samples to the corrosive electrolyte solution does not cause the degradation of the polymer layer. In situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies are performed to monitor local corrosion processes at the buried interface of the epoxy‐like film and the AA2024‐T3 aluminum alloy surface in an aqueous electrolyte solution. Hydrogen evolution due to the reduction of water as the cathodic corrosion reaction leads to local blister formation. Based on the results of the complementary energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis performed at the same region of interest, most of the hydrogen evolved originates at the vicinity of Mg‐containing intermetallic particles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Interfacial Processes and Corrosion Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) 12205 Berlin Germany

Organic Chemistry Freie Universität Berlin 14195 Berlin Germany

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Hatch J. E. · 1984
2. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.00910.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.09.05010.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.09.050 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.183787410.1149/1.1837874 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.186998410.1149/1.1869984 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.204844710.1149/1.2048447 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10894710.1016/j.corsci.2020.108947 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10983610.1016/j.corsci.2021.109836 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0035591510.1007/BF00355915 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0010-938X(97)86099-410.1016/S0010-938X(97)86099-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.08.04310.1016/j.corsci.2009.08.043 ↗
12. 10.1515/corrrev-2014-003910.1515/corrrev-2014-0039 ↗
13. 10.1039/c3cc46673f10.1039/c3cc46673f ↗
14. 10.1149/1.135919910.1149/1.1359199 ↗
15. 10.1149/1.183863310.1149/1.1838633 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.183863410.1149/1.1838634 ↗
17. 10.1038/srep3952510.1038/srep39525 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.00110.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10891210.1016/j.corsci.2020.108912 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.147154610.1149/1.1471546 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.05210.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.052 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.164103810.1149/1.1641038 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.8b1800910.1021/acsami.8b18009 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep4512310.1038/srep45123 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.02.00610.1016/j.corsci.2012.02.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.01610.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00831-910.1016/S0013-4686(02)00831-9 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.4982610.1002/app.49826 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0931811jes10.1149/2.0931811jes ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0363610.1021/acs.iecr.7b03636 ↗
31. 10.1038/ncomms1264010.1038/ncomms12640 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.07910.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.079 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.01110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41529-017-0011-410.1038/s41529-017-0011-4 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.10522710.1063/1.105227 ↗