journal article·2018-04

Measurement of Texture Gradient in Heavily Cold‐Drawn Pearlitic Wires

Aurélie Jamoneau, Jean‐Hubert Schmitt, Denis Solas

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 20· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

It is well established that cold‐drawing of pearlitic wire develops a strong anisotropy due to a preferential <110> orientation of the ferrite phase parallel to the wire axis. The subsequent wire behavior during torsion, which mainly occurs during assembling of drawn wires, is correlated with the texture and its gradient along the wire radius. Although different attempts were made in the past to measure the texture after drawing, it is still challenging since the final wire diameter is on the order of 0.3 mm. The paper presents a simple and robust method to measure the texture gradient by X‐ray diffraction. First, to overcome the problems of a composite sample made of parallel wires, an isotropic reference sample is prepared by cycles of austenite transformation and quenching. The texture gradient is measured at different thicknesses by dissolving the external surface of the wires. This allows the investigation of the first 40 μm of depth. Finally, the results are compared with EBSD measurements on a longitudinal cross‐section to quantify the influence of the drawing conditions: A flat schedule with constant die angles favors a <110> fiber texture with a weak gradient, while increasing the drawing angle for three dies increases the gradient.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MSSMat, CNRS, CentraleSupélec Université Paris‐Saclay Châtenay‐Malabry 92290 France

ICMMO, CNRS Université Paris‐Sud Université Paris‐Saclay Orsay 91405 France

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90296-310.1016/0001-6160(66)90296-3 ↗
2. Langford G. · Metall. Trans · 1970 · 1 · 466
3. Lefever I. · Wire J. Int · 1998 · 31 · 90
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00281-110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00281-1 ↗
5. Van Raemdonck W. · U. D'Haene, Wire J. Int · 1994 · 27 · 68
6. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.03.00310.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.03.003 ↗
7. 10.1111/ffe.1210910.1111/ffe.12109 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-010-0541-710.1007/s11661-010-0541-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.05710.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.057 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0281169810.1007/BF02811698 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.03610.1016/j.msea.2008.12.036 ↗
12. T.Montesin PhD dissertation Université de Metz1991–in French.
13. 10.1179/174328405X2710610.1179/174328405X27106 ↗
14. 10.1107/S002188989200484910.1107/S0021889892004849 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60166-210.1016/S1005-0302(12)60166-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)09756-910.1016/0921-5093(94)09756-9 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12289-009-0410-310.1007/s12289-009-0410-3 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11665-014-1098-110.1007/s11665-014-1098-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.048 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.06110.1016/j.msea.2014.09.061 ↗
21. Szpunar J. A. · J. Mater. Proc. Technol · 1991 · 16 · 305
22. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.43910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.439 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.10810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.108 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.480690610.1063/1.4806906 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.03610.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.036 ↗
26. 10.1179/mst.1985.1.1.4110.1179/mst.1985.1.1.41 ↗
27. 10.1155/TSM.14-18.17510.1155/TSM.14-18.175 ↗
28. 10.1002/pssb.222134020510.1002/pssb.2221340205 ↗
29. 10.1107/S002188988900748X10.1107/S002188988900748X ↗
30. 10.1007/s11661-003-0094-010.1007/s11661-003-0094-0 ↗
31. A.Jamoneau PhD dissertation Université Paris‐Saclay2017–in French.