journal article·2019-11

Switchable Friction across Insulator–Metal Transition in VO2

Davinder Singh, Prashant Mittal, Nitya Nand Gosvami, Viswanath Balakrishnan

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 21· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Significant friction turnover across the insulator to metal phase transition of VO2 microcrystals as measured by friction force microscopy (FFM) and nanoscratch experiments is reported. Insulator to metal transition in chemical vapor deposition‐grown VO2 platelet is confirmed by in situ Raman investigations and electrical resistance measurements that show more than four orders of magnitude change in electrical resistance across transition temperature. The coefficient of friction (COF) for the high‐temperature metallic phase, that is about two times higher than that of room‐temperature insulating phase, is demonstrated. To avoid temperature effects on friction, the friction of coexisting insulating and metallic phases at a constant temperature of ≈69 °C is measured. Additionally, the results also show that this twofold increase in COF is fully reversible when the phase transition is triggered by a heating–cooling cycle and can potentially be used as tuneable friction‐based gripping systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Mandi Himachal Pradesh India

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi India

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.07610310.1103/PhysRevLett.118.076103 ↗
2. Gallagher P. · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1
3. 10.1126/science.125878810.1126/science.1258788 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.112501710.1126/science.1125017 ↗
5. 10.1038/ngeo190510.1038/ngeo1905 ↗
6. 10.1021/la900877h10.1021/la900877h ↗
7. 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.181110.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1811 ↗
8. 10.1243/095440704185677310.1243/0954407041856773 ↗
9. 10.1016/0043-1648(90)90034-810.1016/0043-1648(90)90034-8 ↗
10. Jacko M. G. · 2000 · 1
11. 10.1063/1.238479810.1063/1.2384798 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.494831110.1063/1.4948311 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2009.26610.1038/nnano.2009.266 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.01810.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.018 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.10411010.1103/PhysRevB.91.104110 ↗
16. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/2/02503210.1088/0960-1317/18/2/025032 ↗
17. 10.1088/0960-1317/15/11/00810.1088/0960-1317/15/11/008 ↗
18. 10.1186/2213-9621-1-610.1186/2213-9621-1-6 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0100410.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01004 ↗
20. Ko C. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 2008
21. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.06.01610.1016/j.solmat.2007.06.016 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aag041010.1126/science.aag0410 ↗
23. 10.7567/JJAP.54.05320110.7567/JJAP.54.053201 ↗
24. 10.1021/cr960068q10.1021/cr960068q ↗
25. 10.1098/rspa.1948.000810.1098/rspa.1948.0008 ↗
26. 10.1002/pssr.20151004610.1002/pssr.201510046 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-017-0792-410.1007/s10853-017-0792-4 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-3-642-10803-7_510.1007/978-3-642-10803-7_5 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.160923410.1063/1.1609234 ↗
30. Rabinowicz E. · 1995
31. 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.05.01110.1016/j.ssc.2013.05.011 ↗
32. 10.1002/admi.20150038810.1002/admi.201500388 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.173853110.1063/1.1738531 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.111323910.1126/science.1113239 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.15310710.1103/PhysRevB.79.153107 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRev.185.102210.1103/PhysRev.185.1022 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.32610.1103/PhysRevB.7.326 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.175310010.1063/1.1753100 ↗