journal article·2018-06

Grain Size Depending Dwell‐Fatigue Crack Growth in Inconel 718

Jonas Saarimäki, Mattias Lundberg, Johan J. Moverare

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 20· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Inconel 718 is a commonly used superalloy for turbine discs in the gas turbine industry. Turbine discs are normally subjected to dwell‐fatigue as a result of long constant load cycles. Dwell‐times have been shown to give rise to increased crack propagation rates in superalloys at elevated temperatures. Dwell‐time crack propagation behavior in Inconel 718 has been tested at 550 °C using Kb test samples with 2160 s dwell‐times at maximum load and “pure fatigue” tests. The dwell‐time effect has been studied for differently processed Inconel 718, that is, fine grained bar, grain enlarged bar, and cast material. This has been done in order to investigate the effect of grain size on crack propagation. Microstructure characterization is conducted using scanning electron microscopy techniques such as electron channeling contrast imaging and electron backscatter diffraction. Time dependent crack propagation rates are strongly affected by grain size. Propagation rates increase with decreasing grain size, whereas crack tip blunting increased with increasing grain size.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Engineering Materials, Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University SE‐58183 Linköping Sweden

Funding

Energimyndigheten · Siemens

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.023 ↗
2. 10.1016/0921-5093(92)90358-810.1016/0921-5093(92)90358-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00192-910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00192-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00005-210.1016/S1359-6454(01)00005-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/0025-5416(82)90167-710.1016/0025-5416(82)90167-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.03710.1016/j.msea.2012.04.037 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00056-X10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00056-X ↗
8. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00074-610.1016/S0921-5093(02)00074-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.018 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.06810.1016/j.msea.2014.06.068 ↗
11. Koul A. K. · 1988 · 3
12. 10.1007/s10853-007-2363-610.1007/s10853-007-2363-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/0956-716X(95)00120-K10.1016/0956-716X(95)00120-K ↗
14. 10.7449/1991/Superalloys_1991_375_38810.7449/1991/Superalloys_1991_375_388 ↗
15. Ponnelle S. · Superalloys 718, 625, 706 Deriv · 2001 · 92 · 307
16. 10.1007/s11661-013-1971-910.1007/s11661-013-1971-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.06310.1016/j.msea.2017.03.063 ↗
18. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00375.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00375.x ↗
19. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00057-210.1016/S0142-1123(99)00057-2 ↗
20. 10.1179/mht.1999.00310.1179/mht.1999.003 ↗
21. 10.1002/mawe.20030066310.1002/mawe.200300663 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.11.00810.1016/j.tafmec.2015.11.008 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0264665710.1007/BF02646657 ↗
24. Storgärds E. · J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power · 2015 · 138 · 1
25. J.Saarimäki KbSamplePureFatigueEvaluationCode Version 1.0.02017.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.581243.
26. J.Saarimäki KbSampleDwellFatigueEvaluationCode Version 1.0.02017.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.581242.
27. J.Saarimäki KbSampleCreepEvaluationCode Version 1.0.02017.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.581241.
28. Kamaladasa R. J. · Microsc. Sci. Technol. Appl. Eduaction · 2010 · 3 · 1583
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.02710.1016/j.msea.2011.08.027 ↗
30. Wackermann K. · ASTM Int · 2011 · 8 · 110.1520/JAI103569 ↗
31. 10.1179/174892306X9967910.1179/174892306X99679 ↗
32. 10.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_581_59210.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_581_592 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.05010.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.050 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.11110.1016/j.msea.2016.01.111 ↗