journal article·2017-12

Tensile and High‐Cycle Fatigue Properties of Steel Sheet with Trace Silicon

Meng Xiao Zhang, Jian Chao Pang, Li Bei Zhu, Long Pan, Liang Liang Nie, Yun Xian Mao, Man Chen, Zhe Feng Zhang

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 19· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The tensile properties, high‐cycle fatigue properties, fracture surface morphologies, corresponding damage mechanisms, and dislocation patterns of two steels with trace silicon, 550TG and SD320, are investigated. It is found that the SD320 has a higher tensile strength than 550TG, but lower plasticity. In general, some deep cracks appear along the direction of rolling in all the tensile specimens and the fatigue limit of SD320 is higher. In particular, the 550TG shows a continuously decreasing S–N characteristic without fatigue limit at the higher cycle region, which can be explained by their differences of dislocation morphologies. Furthermore, the tensile and fatigue damage mechanisms are deeply analyzed and discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science Institute of Metal Research Chinese Academy of Sciences 72 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016 China

Department of Mechanical Engineering Liaoning Shihua University No.1 Dandong Road Fushun 113001 China

Power Generation Company China Southern Power Grid 32 Longkou East Road Guangzhou 510630 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. He Z. Z. · 2008
2. Gan Y. · 2006
3. 10.1016/S0168-874X(98)00008-010.1016/S0168-874X(98)00008-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1350-6307(99)00025-410.1016/S1350-6307(99)00025-4 ↗
5. 10.1109/TIA.2013.226465110.1109/TIA.2013.2264651 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.10.05110.1016/j.jmmm.2013.10.051 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.402907310.1115/1.4029073 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.00910.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.009 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.03310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.033 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00015-010.1016/S1359-6462(03)00015-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/0001-6160(65)90206-310.1016/0001-6160(65)90206-3 ↗
12. Ho M. H. · Trans. Tech. Publ · 2014 · 1052 · 127
13. 10.1002/adem.20160058110.1002/adem.201600581 ↗
14. 10.1002/adem.20150056110.1002/adem.201500561 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.01310.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.013 ↗
16. Hollomon J. H. · AIME Trans · 1945 · 12 · 1
17. Huang L. · 2016
18. Hosford W. F. · 2010
19. Burgers J. M. · Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetenschap · 1939 · 42 · 293
20. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00569-010.1016/S0924-0136(00)00569-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.04910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.049 ↗
22. 10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/30310.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
23. Song W. X. · 2008
24. Meyers M. A. · 2009
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.10310.1016/j.msea.2012.11.103 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.03410.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.034 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.06710.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.067 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.09110.1016/j.msea.2006.01.091 ↗
29. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
30. Murakami Y. · 2005
31. 10.1016/0142-1123(95)99733-Q10.1016/0142-1123(95)99733-Q ↗
32. Hänel B. · 2003
33. K. W.Brengle C.Speedway Am. Assoc. State Highway Transp. Officials Washington2008 1052 127.