journal article·2003-03-26

Non‐Additive Effects in the Elastic Behavior of Dental Composites

M. Wissler, H.R. Lusti, C. Oberson, A.H. Widmann‐Schupak, G. Zappini, A.A. Gusev

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 5· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The effective stiffness of dental composites consisting of a polymer and two fillers of different particle size is not predicted correctly by an additive approach (i.e. predicting the stiffness of a polymer and one‐filler system first). Better accordance with the experimental behavior is reached using a direct finite‐element calculation, which has been applied to this type of problem for the first time here.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Drilling and Well Engineering · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M ↗
2. By using short fibers or platelets one could in principle achieve the desirable reinforcement at already lower fillers’ loadings. However because of sharp edges short fibers are unwanted in many dental applications while platelets are difficult to disperse evenly.
3. 10.1038/188910a010.1038/188910a0 ↗
4. R. M. Christensen Mechanics of Composite Materials Krieger Publishing Company Malabar Florida 1991.
5. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00016-110.1016/S0022-5096(97)00016-1 ↗
6. 10.1021/ma001979b10.1021/ma001979b ↗
7. Palmyra 2.3 MatSim GmbH Zürich Switzerland http://www.matsim.ch.
8. L. D. Landau E. M. Lifshitz Theory of Elasticity Vol. 7 3rd ed. Oxford Butterworth‐Heinemann Woburn MA1999.
9. O. C. Zienkiewicz R. L. Taylor The Finite Element Method Vol. 1: The Basis 5th ed. Butterworth‐Heinemann Oxford U.K.2000.
10. 10.1088/0370-1301/69/8/30510.1088/0370-1301/69/8/305 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0196886710.1007/BF01968867 ↗
12. 10.6028/jres.078A.01910.6028/jres.078A.019 ↗
13. 10.6028/jres.079A.00710.6028/jres.079A.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-5096(79)90032-210.1016/0022-5096(79)90032-2 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.363644610.1115/1.3636446 ↗
16. Because of the 10 to 1 diameter ratio assumed for big and small spheres the computer models studied in this work were comprised of 103fs/fbsmall spheres per each big spheres.
17. We have found by using image analysis that the random hard‐fiber Percus–Yevick statistic is representative for “real” industrial fiber reinforced composites.[5 14]
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00152-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00152-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00089-110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00089-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00106-910.1016/S0266-3538(02)00106-9 ↗
21. 10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<427::AID-ADEM427>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<427::AID-ADEM427>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
22. 10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:21<1641::AID-ADMA1641>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:21<1641::AID-ADMA1641>3.0.CO;2-P ↗