Fatigue Crack Growth in Austenitic Stainless Steel: Effects of Phase Shifted Loading and Crack Paths
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the cyclic crack growth behavior of biaxially loaded cruciform specimens is investigated and compared with an uniaxially loaded cruciform specimen together with the Paris law to detect differences between uniaxial and multiaxial experiments and to understand the occuring mechanisms. The tests are performed on a planar‐biaxial test system and a stress ratio of R = 0.1. Biaxial loading takes place both in‐phase as well as out‐of‐phase, after an initial technical crack is generated, whereby the phase shift loading leads to a constantly changing biaxial force ratio . The crack path curved after changing from in‐phase to out‐of‐phase loading and subsequently the cracks grow straight again. Both cracks of each specimen have an almost identical crack path indicating a symmetrical stress distribution on the specimen. The calculation of the stress intensity factor range for the curved crack path is done by FE‐calculations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Materials Engineering Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg Gustav‐Zeuner‐Str. 5 09599 Freiberg Germany
Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg Lampadiusstraße 4 09599 Freiberg Germany
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.02910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.029 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11661-014-2726-y10.1007/s11661-014-2726-y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.08310.1016/j.msea.2015.06.083 ↗
4. Ackermann S. · Fract. Struct. Integr · 2015 · 9 · 580
5. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00867.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00867.x ↗
6. 10.1115/1.280681710.1115/1.2806817 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.280681810.1115/1.2806818 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-94-007-6680-810.1007/978-94-007-6680-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.005 ↗
12. Henkel S. · Fracture and Structural Integrity · 2015 · 9 · 466
13. 10.1111/ffe.1269010.1111/ffe.12690 ↗
14. 10.1520/STP36221S10.1520/STP36221S ↗
15. 10.1088/0508-3443/14/11/31910.1088/0508-3443/14/11/319 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00995.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00995.x ↗
17. 10.1115/1.344366610.1115/1.3443666 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.04.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.04.013 ↗
19. ImageJ 1.50i https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
20. ASTM E647‐13ae1 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates ASTM International West Conshohocken2013.
21. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00855.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00855.x ↗
22. C. D.Donne Übertragbarkeit von Rißwiderstandskurven von Standardproben auf biaxial belastete bauteilähnliche Kreuzproben VDI Verlag Düsseldorf Fortschrittberichte VDI. 2051997.