A Comparative Study on the Textile Processing of Carbon and Multifunctional Glass Fiber Sensor Yarns for Structural Health Monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
In this comparative study two sensor yarns, such as carbon filament yarns and carbon nanotube coated glass filament yarns are analyzed regarding their electrical property changes during textile manufacturing into multi‐layer weft knitted structures as well as during compression molding into a composite plate due to the different electro‐mechanical behavior, various sensitivities, and changing ways of acting as an in‐situ sensor: yarns act either as a conductive fiber itself (carbon) or as an electrical conductive sizing (CNT‐coated glass). Both sensor yarns under investigation have to be considered differently with regard to changes in the electrical conductivity due to mechanical loading during textile processing and possible healing of cracks during compression molding.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Smart Materials for Construction · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Leibniz‐Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V. (IPF) Hohe Straße 6 01069 Dresden Germany
Technische Universität Dresden Institute of Textile Machinery and High Performance Material Technology (ITM) George‐Bähr‐Straße 3c 01062 Dresden Germany
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.01910.1016/j.procir.2013.09.019 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11837-012-0357-610.1007/s11837-012-0357-6 ↗
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.120.28910.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.120.289 ↗
4. 10.1080/19475411.2011.65150910.1080/19475411.2011.651509 ↗
5. Rausch J. · Compos. Sci. Technol · 2010 · 70 · 1058
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.sna.2012.03.02910.1016/j.sna.2012.03.029 ↗
8. A.Horoschenkoff T.Müller A.Kröll Proc. International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM–17) Edinburgh UK2009 27–31 July.
9. A.Horoschenkoff T.Müller C.Strössner Proc. International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM‐18) Jeju Island Korea2011 21–26 August.
10. 10.1177/002199831243798310.1177/0021998312437983 ↗
11. A.Horoschenkoff.www.lightweightdesign.de2014 (2) 28.10.1365/s35725-014-0347-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2013.08.04510.1016/j.sna.2013.08.045 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.05810.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.058 ↗
14. Zhao H. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 2
15. 10.1080/19475411.2011.65150910.1080/19475411.2011.651509 ↗
16. H.Lin PhD2015 Technische Universität Dresden Germany 13.
17. P.Offermann O.Diestel DFG OF 17/9‐3‐Report2002 Technische Universität Dresden Germany.
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.011 ↗
19. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.7210.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.72 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.007 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.54110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.541 ↗
22. 10.1177/004051751142960210.1177/0040517511429602 ↗
23. Ch.Schulz PhD‐Thesis2015 Technische Universität Dresden Germany.