journal article·2026-03-18Open access

Impact of Textile Architecture on the Electromechanical Behavior of Conductive Carbon: Silicone Composite Strain Sensors

Gabriela Ananieva, Giulia Spallanzani, Peter Zalar

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 6

Abstract

Stretchable strain sensors can be used to track motion or biophysical stimuli in a variety of applications, yet their adoption is hindered by complex fabrication processes and unpredictable electromechanical behavior. To overcome this limitation, we have integrated a stretchable carbon black composite consisting of commercially available materials directly onto a textile using stencil printing to realize a strain sensor. We find that the knit structure significantly influences sensor uniformity, dimensional stability, and stretchability, while yarn morphology dictates the hysteresis effect. This is demonstrated using a double weft (1 × 1 rib) and a double warp (tricot) knit. The stitch density of the textile is inversely proportional to the sensor's initial resistance and to the gauge factor, irrespective of the textile's mechanical or chemical properties. This study presents a novel model for estimating nominal resistance at a given strain near the percolation threshold, using solely the textile architecture, which can greatly assist in the development of wearable electronics in textiles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Holst Centre/TNO Eindhoven the Netherlands

CY Cergy Paris Université, LPPI Neuville‐sur‐Oise France

Human Interactive Materials Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) Eindhoven the Netherlands

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aisy.20200003910.1002/aisy.202000039 ↗
2. 10.3390/s2024723610.3390/s20247236 ↗
3. 10.1002/admt.20190031510.1002/admt.201900315 ↗
4. 10.3390/s1811382210.3390/s18113822 ↗
5. 10.1002/admt.20190090810.1002/admt.201900908 ↗
6. 10.1177/152808371561994810.1177/1528083715619948 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1105076810.3390/ma11050768 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10867410.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108674 ↗
9. 10.3390/s2008238310.3390/s20082383 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.7b1602210.1021/acsami.7b16022 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12274‐018‐2043‐710.1007/s12274‐018‐2043‐7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11265910.1016/j.sna.2021.112659 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10061710.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100617 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10864110.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108641 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.017 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0051010.1021/acsapm.0c00510 ↗
17. 10.1002/mame.20210011310.1002/mame.202100113 ↗
18. 10.1186/s40580‐019‐0198‐x10.1186/s40580‐019‐0198‐x ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.7b1867710.1021/acsami.7b18677 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.sna.2020.11213110.1016/j.sna.2020.112131 ↗
21. 10.1039/c9ra09164e10.1039/c9ra09164e ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10635010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106350 ↗
23. 10.1039/C8MH01062E10.1039/C8MH01062E ↗
24. 10.1088/1361‐665X/aaf3ce10.1088/1361‐665X/aaf3ce ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sna.2020.11235510.1016/j.sna.2020.112355 ↗
26. Spahr M. E. · 2016 · 1
27. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.3710.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.37 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853‐020‐05279‐x10.1007/s10853‐020‐05279‐x ↗
29. 10.1039/978178262653410.1039/9781782626534 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cagd.2020.10188310.1016/j.cagd.2020.101883 ↗
31. 10.1155/2016/562838710.1155/2016/5628387 ↗
32. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-458-1.00005-410.1016/B978-1-78242-458-1.00005-4 ↗
33. 10.1088/0031‐9120/47/4/45610.1088/0031‐9120/47/4/456 ↗
34. Study on Tensile Properties of Coated Fabrics and Laminates