journal article·2015-11-01

Defect tolerance under environmentally assisted cracking conditions

Jaime Tupiassú Pinho de Castro, Rodrigo Vieira Landim, Marco Antonio Meggiolaro

Corrosion Reviews· Volume 33· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Notch sensitivity effects under environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) conditions have been recently quantified considering the tolerance to short cracks that may start at their tips and become nonpropagating after growing for a while, a behavior that depends on the stress gradients ahead of the notch tips and on the basic material resistances to crack initiation and propagation inside an aggressive medium. This model can provide a powerful alternative design tool for the pass/nonpass criterion traditionally used to deal with such mechanical-chemical problems, since it properly considers and quantifies the stress analysis issues that affect them. The model uses the analogy between the notch sensitivity behavior under fatigue and under EAC conditions, so it quantifies how the stress gradient around the notch tips affects the tolerance to mechanically short cracks that depart from there, considering the characteristics of the loading and of the notch geometry, as well as the basic material properties inside the given environment, expressed by its EAC resistances to crack initiation from a smooth surface S EAC and to crack propagation K IEAC , without the need for any data fitting parameter. Moreover, since this model has been validated by proper tests, it can be used to propose a defect-tolerant design criterion under EAC conditions that includes the unavoidable notch effects always present in actual structural components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), R. Marquês de S. Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22541-900, Brazil

Corrosion Laboratory, National Institute of Technology (INT), Av. Venezuela 82, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20081-312, Brazil

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Atzori B, Lazzarin P, Filippi S. Cracks and notches: analogies and differences of the relevant stress distributions and practical consequences in fatigue limit predictions. Int J Fatigue 2001; 23: 355–362.10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00107-9 ↗
2. Atzori B, Lazzarin P, Meneghetti G. Fracture mechanics and notch sensitivity. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2003; 26: 257–267.10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00633.x ↗
3. Atzori B, Lazzarin P, Meneghetti G. A unified treatment of the mode I fatigue limit of components containing notches or defects. Int J Fract 2005; 133: 61–87.10.1007/s10704-005-2183-0 ↗
4. Atzori B, Meneghetti G, Susmel L. Material fatigue properties for assessing mechanical components weakened by notches and defects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2005; 28: 83–97.10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00862.x ↗
5. Bai P, Zheng S, Zhao H, Ding Y, Wu J, Chen C. Investigations of the diverse corrosion products on steel in a hydrogen sulfide environment. Corros Sci 2014; 87: 397–406.10.1016/j.corsci.2014.06.048 ↗
6. Bazant ZP. Scaling of quasibrittle fracture: asymptotic analysis. Int J Fract 1997; 83: 19–40.10.1023/A:1007387823522 ↗
7. Bertness TA, Chilingarian GV, Al-Bassam M. Corrosion in drilling and producing operations. In: Chilingarian GV, Robertson JO, Kumar S, editors. Developments in petroleum science v.19B, Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 1989: 283–317.10.1016/S0376-7361(08)70507-7 ↗
8. Castro JTP, Leite JCC. Does notch sensibility exist in environmentally assisted cracking (EAC)? J Mat Res Technol 2013; 2: 288–295.10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.02.010 ↗
9. Castro JTP, Meggiolaro MA. Is notch sensitivity a stress analysis problem? Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 2013; 25: 79–86.10.3221/IGF-ESIS.25.12 ↗
10. Castro JTP, Meggiolaro MA. On the tolerance to short cracks under fatigue and SCC conditions. Procedia Eng 2014; 74: 242–245.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.256 ↗
11. Castro JTP, Meggiolaro MA. Fatigue design techniques vol III–crack propagation, thermal and statistical effects. CA, USA: Create Space, 2015.
12. Castro JTP, Meggiolaro MA, Miranda ACO, Wu H, Imad A, Nouredine B. Prediction of fatigue crack initiation lives at elongated notch roots using short crack concepts. Int J Fatigue 2012; 42: 172–182.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.010 ↗
13. Castro JTP, Landim RV, Leite JCC, Meggiolaro, MA. Prediction of notch sensitivity effects in fatigue and EAC. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2015; 38:161–179.10.1111/ffe.12156 ↗
14. Chapetti MD. Fatigue propagation threshold of short cracks under constant amplitude loading. Int J Fatigue 2003; 25: 1319–1326.10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00065-3 ↗
15. Chapetti MD. Fatigue assessment using an integrated threshold curve method–applications. Eng Fract Mech 2008; 75: 1854–1863.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.005 ↗
16. Ciavarella M, Meneghetti G. On fatigue limit in the presence of notches: classical vs. recent unified formulations. Int J Fatigue 2004; 26: 289–298.10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00106-3 ↗
17. Cramer SD, Covino BS Jr, editors. Corrosion: fundamentals, testing, and protection, ASM handbook v.13A. Materials Park, OH, USA: ASM International, 2003.10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.9781627081825 ↗
18. Dietzel W. Fracture mechanics approach to stress corrosion cracking. Anales de Mecánica de la Fractura 2001; 18: 1–7.
19. Dixon WJ. The up-and-down method for small samples. Am Stat Assoc J 1965; 60: 967–978.10.1080/01621459.1965.10480843 ↗
20. Du Quesnay DL, Yu MT, Topper TH. An analysis of notch-size effects at the fatigue limit. J Test Eval 1988; 16: 375–385.10.1520/JTE11081J ↗
21. El Haddad MH, Smith KN, Topper TH. Fatigue crack propagation of short cracks. J Eng Mater Technol 1979; 101: 42–46.10.1115/1.3443647 ↗
22. El Haddad MH, Topper TH, Smith KN. Prediction of non-propagating cracks. Eng Fract Mech 1979; 11: 573–584.10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X ↗
23. Fontana MG. Corrosion engineering. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill Book Co., 1986.
24. Glickman EE. Dissolution condensation mechanism of stress corrosion cracking in liquid metals: driving force and crack kinetics. Metall Mater Trans A 2011; 42: 250–266.10.1007/s11661-010-0429-6 ↗
25. Kane RD. Roles of H2S in the behavior of engineering alloys: a review of literature and experience: NACE International Conference, Paper, San Diego, CA, USA, 274, 1998.10.5006/C1998-98274 ↗
26. Kitagawa H, Takahashi S. Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small crack or cracks in the early stage. Second International Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Boston, MA, 1976: 627–631.
27. Korb LJ, Olson DL, editors. Corrosion, ASM handbook v.13. ASM, 1992.
28. Krupp U, Düber O, Christ HJ, Künkler B, Schick A, Fritzen CP. Application of the EBSD technique to describe the initiation and growth behaviour of microstructurally short fatigue cracks in a duplex steel. J Microsc 2004; 213: 313–320.10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01306.x ↗
29. Lawson L, Chen EY, Meshii M. Near-threshold fatigue: a review. Int J Fatigue 1999; 21: S15–S34.10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00053-5 ↗
30. Leis BN, Eiber RJ. Stress-corrosion cracking on gas-transmission pipelines: history, causes, and mitigation. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Onshore Pipelines, Berlin, 1997.
31. Lin SK, Lee YL, Lu MW. Evaluation of the staircase and the accelerated test methods for fatigue limit distributions. Int J Fatigue 2011; 23: 75–83.10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00039-6 ↗
32. Lisagor WB. Environmental cracking–stress corrosion. ASTM corrosion tests and standards–interpretation and application (manual 20). ASTM, 2005.
33. Livieri P, Tovo R. Fatigue limit evaluation of notches, small cracks and defects: an engineering approach. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2004; 27: 1037–1049.10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00816.x ↗
34. Lorenzino P, Navarro A. Initiation and growth behaviour of very-long microstucturally short fatigue cracks. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 2013; 25: 138–144.10.3221/IGF-ESIS.25.20 ↗
35. Lynch SP. Failures of engineering components due to environmentally assisted cracking. Pract Fail Anal 2003; 3: 33–42.10.1361/152981503771816754 ↗
36. McEvily AJ. The growth of short fatigue cracks: a review. Mater Sci Res Int 1988; 4: 3–11.
37. McEvily AJ, Wei RP. Fracture mechanics and corrosion fatigue. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Corrosion fatigue: Chemistry, mechanics and microstructure. Houston, Texas: NACE, 1972: 381–395.
38. Meggiolaro MA, Miranda ACO, Castro JTP. Short crack threshold estimates to predict notch sensitivity factors in fatigue. Int J Fatigue 2007; 29:2022–2031.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.022 ↗
39. NACE TM0177. Laboratory testing of metals for resistance to sulfide stress cracking and stress corrosion cracking in H2S environments. Texas, USA: NACE International, 2005.
40. Navarro A, de los Rios ER. A microstructurally-short fatigue crack growth equation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1988; 5: 383–396.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01391.x ↗
41. Parkins RN. Development of strain-rate testing and its implications. In: Ugiansky GM, Payer JH, editors. ASTM STP 665, stress corrosion cracking–the slow strain-rate technique. Symposium was held 2–4 May 1977 in Toronto, Canada. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American society for testing and materials, ASTM, 1979: 5–25.10.1520/STP38106S ↗
42. Robertson WM. Propagation of a crack filled with liquid metal. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1966; 236: 1478–1482.
43. Sadananda K. Failure diagram and chemical driving forces for subcritical crack growth. Metall Mater Trans A 2013; 44: 1190–1199.10.1007/s11661-012-1469-x ↗
44. Sadananda K, Vasudevan AK. Short crack growth and internal stresses. Int J Fatigue 1997; 19: S99–S108.10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00057-1 ↗
45. Sadananda K, Vasudevan AK. Failure diagram for chemically assisted crack. Metall Mater Trans A 2011; 42: 296–303.10.1007/s11661-010-0469-y ↗
46. Tanaka K, Nakai Y, Yamashita M. Fatigue growth threshold of small cracks. Int J Fract 1981; 17: 519–533.10.1007/BF00033345 ↗
47. Vallellano C, Navarro A, Dominguez J. Fatigue crack growth threshold conditions at notches. Part I: theory. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2000; 23: 113–121.10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00257.x ↗
48. Vasudevan AK, Sadananda K. Classification of environmentally assisted fatigue crack growth behavior. Int J Fatigue 2009; 31: 1696–1708.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.019 ↗
49. Vasudevan AK, Sadananda K. Review of environmentally assisted cracking. Metall Mater Transact A 2011a; 42A: 279–295.10.1007/s11661-010-0472-3 ↗
50. Vasudevan AK, Sadananda K. Role of internal stresses on the incubation times during stress corrosion cracking. Metall Mater Transact A 2011b; 42A: 396–404.10.1007/s11661-010-0470-5 ↗
51. Vasudevan AK, Sadananda K. Role of slip mode on stress corrosion cracking behavior. Metall Mater Transact A 2011c; 42A: 405–414.10.1007/s11661-010-0471-4 ↗
52. Verreman Y. Propagation des fissures curtes. In: Bathias C, Pineau A, editors. Fatigue des Máteriaux et Structures 2. Hermes-Lavoisier, 2008.
53. Wu H, Imad A, Nouredine B, Castro JTP, Meggiolaro MA. On the prediction of the residual fatigue life of cracked structures repaired by the stop-hole method. Int J Fatigue 2010; 32: 670–677.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.011 ↗
54. Yu MT, Duquesnay DL, Topper TH. Notch fatigue behavior of 1045 steel. Int J Fatigue 1988; 10: 109–116.10.1016/0142-1123(88)90038-2 ↗