Experimental and Analytical Study on the High Strain Rate Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Single‐Crystal Silicon for Representative Crystal Orientations
Source abstract
Abstract
As the most commonly used substrate material in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), the quasistatic mechanical properties of single‐crystal silicon (SCS) have been widely studied. However, there is a lack of data and insufficient research on its mechanical characteristics under high strain rates, which limits the expansion of silicon‐based MEMS applications. Herein, the dynamic mechanical behavior of SCS under high strain rates is investigated using split Hopkinson pressure bar experiments conducted on samples with three different crystal orientations. The results indicate that the ultimate strength of all three crystallographic orientations significantly increases with the strain rate, demonstrating a clear strain rate sensitivity. Among them, the <111> orientation exhibits the highest ultimate strength across all strain rates, while the <100> orientation shows the lowest. Additionally, compared to quasistatic loading, the elastic modulus of SCS experiences a reduction of over 50% at high strain rates. This study offers a basis for future efforts in establishing rate‐dependent constitutive models for SCS, optimizing the design of silicon‐based MEMS structures, and broadening the application scope of silicon‐based MEMS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Aviation Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an 710072 China
School of Mechanics Civil Engineering and Architecture Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an 710072 China
Funding
State Key Laboratory of Electromechanical Dynamic Control
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Sze S. M. · 2021
2. 10.1149/1.208627710.1149/1.2086277 ↗
3. Li D · Nanotech‐Nology Precision Eng. · 2008 · 6 · 242
4. Lv Y. · 2013
5. 10.1016/j.sna.2003.10.06310.1016/j.sna.2003.10.063 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00920.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00920.x ↗
7. Cheng J. · J. Harbin Institute Technol. · 2019 · 51 · 16
8. 10.1088/0957-0233/10/8/30510.1088/0957-0233/10/8/305 ↗
9. Stanimirović Z. · Micro Electron. Mech. Syst. · 2009 · 35 · L74
10. 10.1533/978085709648710.1533/9780857096487 ↗
11. 10.3390/s2417585410.3390/s24175854 ↗
12. F.Wang L.Zhang W.Lou F.Wang L.Zhang W.Lou D.Wang L.Li Z.Qiao 2019 IEEE 14th Inter..
13. 10.3390/app1403112110.3390/app14031121 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2025.10433210.1016/j.ijengsci.2025.104332 ↗
15. 10.3390/mi1408156510.3390/mi14081565 ↗
16. Tang B. · Aerosp. Sci. Technol. · 2025 · 166
17. 10.3389/fphy.2025.152217210.3389/fphy.2025.1522172 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.06.06610.1016/j.actaastro.2025.06.066 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.00510.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.005 ↗
20. 10.1063/5.022380310.1063/5.0223803 ↗
21. Chen W. W. · 2010
22. 10.1007/BF0241105610.1007/BF02411056 ↗
23. Miller W. H. · 1839
24. Song L. · Explos. Shock Waves · 2005 · 4 · 368
25. 10.1063/1.494293310.1063/1.4942933 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.02210.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.022 ↗
27. 10.3390/mi1605057010.3390/mi16050570 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10774810.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107748 ↗