Influence of Testing Temperature on the Mechanical Performance of Brazed Conventionally and Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel Joints
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, brazed joints between samples of 316L stainless steel (316LSS) are formed using the Ag155 brazing filler metal. As an additional aspect of the investigation, the joints combine stainless steel formed by conventional processing and by additive manufacture (AM). These samples are then tested to determine their shear response with temperature, employing a bespoke test design comprising a set of three cylindrical samples held together with two brazed joints. Multiple samples are tested at 20 and 500 °C and single samples at intermediate temperatures. A shear strength above 200 MPa is retained up until 200 °C, and, despite significant differences in steel microstructure, the conventional or AM processing of the 316LSS does not affect joint failure. At higher temperatures, there is a progressive decrease in both the failure strength and the ductility of the joint. The reasons for the behavior are traced to changes, potentially associated with a transformed layer in the steel near to the joint, in the operating failure mechanism as determined by observations of the failure surfaces of the joints. These results highlight the importance of systematic investigations of the strength of brazed joints with temperature and correlation of these to the joint microstructure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical, Materials and Biological Engineering University of Sheffield Mappin St, Sheffield City Centre Sheffield S1 3JD UK
Laboratory of Mechanical Metallurgy École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne 1015 Switzerland
Funding
UK Research and Innovation · Henry Royce Institute · EPSRC
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09506608.2019.161331110.1080/09506608.2019.1613311 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.02910.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.029 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.04210.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.042 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13999210.1016/j.msea.2020.139992 ↗
5. 10.1515/ntrev-2022-050910.1515/ntrev-2022-0509 ↗
6. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-008310.1515/ntrev-2020-0083 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.04.06410.1016/j.vacuum.2019.04.064 ↗
8. Xue P. · Metals · 2019 · 9 · 3
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
10. 10.1080/09506608.2015.111664910.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat502110.1038/nmat5021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13863310.1016/j.msea.2019.138633 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-020-05109-010.1007/s10853-020-05109-0 ↗
14. F. S.Livera Brazing of Additively Manufactured Metals PhD Thesis Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Sheffield2024.
15. 10.2320/matertrans.48.105510.2320/matertrans.48.1055 ↗
16. 10.1080/00218464.2021.194190310.1080/00218464.2021.1941903 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.10110.1016/j.msea.2007.10.101 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.00910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10150210.1016/j.mtla.2022.101502 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10091710.1016/j.addma.2019.100917 ↗
21. Kaynak Y. · J. Manuf. Mater. Process. · 2018 · 2 · 36