journal article·2023-04Open access

Numerical Macroscale Modeling of a Magnetized Ferromagnetic Fiber in Viscous Fluidic Environments

Cédric De Schryver, Dries Vanoost, Bart Buffel, Davy Pissoort, Frederik Desplentere

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 8

Abstract

Herein, the experimental results of discontinuous ferromagnetic‐fiber manipulation using magnetic‐field interaction are presented. High‐aspect‐ratio steel fibers are realigned in viscous polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMSs) with electromagnets. The influence of the matrix viscosity, magnetic‐field strength, and fiber‐aspect ratio on the dynamics of the realignment process is investigated. To predict the fiber behavior under static magnetic fields, two commonly used theoretical models (hereinafter referred to as the torque model and the exponential model) are compared to a nonlinear regression model proposed by the authors. The latter model focuses on the alignment rate of a fiber as a function of the physical process parameters. To indicate the best fitting model for the experimental results, the statistical root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) values of the fitted models are assessed. A total of 54 comparisons are made between the exponential model and the authors’ nonlinear regression model. In 50 cases, the nonlinear regression model provides a better fit.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering ProPoliS Research Group KU Leuven Bruges Campus Spoorwegstraat 12 8200 Bruges Belgium

Department of Electrical Engineering M-Group (Mechatronics Group) KU Leuven Bruges Campus Spoorwegstraat 12 8200 Bruges Belgium

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Fu S.-Y. · 2009
2. 10.1002/pc.2634410.1002/pc.26344 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2472710.1002/pc.24727 ↗
4. 10.1080/20550324.2018.155183010.1080/20550324.2018.1551830 ↗
5. 10.1021/am402975a10.1021/am402975a ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.8b0296410.1021/acsami.8b02964 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2484810.1002/pc.24848 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2635710.1002/pc.26357 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2473610.1002/pc.24736 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.007 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.161663810.1063/1.1616638 ↗
12. 10.1002/pen.2568910.1002/pen.25689 ↗
13. Jagatheesan K. · Indian J. Fiber Text. Res. · 2014 · 39 · 329
14. 10.1002/pc.2566510.1002/pc.25665 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2465610.1002/pc.24656 ↗
16. 10.1088/1757-899X/18/5/05200810.1088/1757-899X/18/5/052008 ↗
17. 10.1039/C4SM02108H10.1039/C4SM02108H ↗
18. 10.1021/la990761j10.1021/la990761j ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.001 ↗
20. 10.1039/C2SM26910D10.1039/C2SM26910D ↗
21. 10.1039/C9PY01008D10.1039/C9PY01008D ↗
22. 10.1122/1.300540510.1122/1.3005405 ↗
23. P.Marcon K.Ostanina inPIERS Proc. Kuala Lumpur Malaysia2012.
24. 10.1109/978047054462410.1109/9780470544624 ↗
25. 10.1039/C3SM52294F10.1039/C3SM52294F ↗
26. 10.1051/jphysrad:0193400501004970010.1051/jphysrad:01934005010049700 ↗
27. 10.1002/bip.1975.36014111510.1002/bip.1975.360141115 ↗
28. 10.1295/polymj.35.82310.1295/polymj.35.823 ↗
29. 10.7567/JJAP.55.01500110.7567/JJAP.55.015001 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2707510.1002/pc.27075 ↗
31. Meeker D. · 2020
32. 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.00110.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 ↗
33. 10.1186/1471-2210-10-610.1186/1471-2210-10-6 ↗
34. 10.1122/1.352347710.1122/1.3523477 ↗
35. 10.1122/1.300540210.1122/1.3005402 ↗