journal article·2025-07Open access

Performance Comparison of Surface Sensitizers for Diode Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Polyamide 12

Michael Willeke, Alexander Sommereyns, Simon Leupold, Arne Lüddecke, Arno Kwade, Nick Hantke, Jan T. Sehrt, Michael Schmidt, Anna R. Ziefuss, Stephan Barcikowski

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 27· Issue 14

Abstract

The efficient processing of polyamide 12 (PA12) in laser‐based additive manufacturing with near‐infrared (NIR) diode lasers requires modification with NIR‐absorbing additives. This study presents the absorbance‐normalized investigation, where the loading of copper sulfide (CuS), lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6), and carbon black (CB) on PA12 is adjusted to achieve identical absorbance at the diode laser printing wavelength of 808 nm. This approach enables a direct comparison of their effects on the processability, mechanical properties, and thermal stability, independent of the energy input. Interestingly, sub‐vol% sensitizer amounts are sufficient for processing. CuS, at only 0.04 vol%, achieves the highest mechanical strength (≈41 MPa) of the printed parts, good powder flowability, and thermal stability. LaB6 achieves the best flowability, but requires three times higher loading, affecting fusion behavior, while CB needs increased amounts due to its low density. All nanoparticle‐modified powders maintain stable optical properties during laser powder bed fusion processing, which is a basic requirement for a refresh rate of 0%, outperforming conventional organic dyes in thermal stability. These findings pave the way for high‐performance polymer feedstocks in diode laser‐based additive manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Photopolymerization techniques and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Technical Chemistry I and Center for Nanointegration (CENIDE) University of Duisburg‐Essen Universitätsstraße 7 45141 Essen Germany

Institute of Photonic Technologies Friedrich‐Alexander‐University of Erlangen‐Nürnberg Konrad‐Zuse‐Straße 3/5 91052 Erlangen Germany

Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Paul‐Gordan‐Straße 6 91052 Erlangen Germany

Institute for Particle Technology Technical University of Braunschweig Volkmaroder Str. 5 38104 Braunschweig Germany

Chair of Hybrid Additive Manufacturing Ruhr University Bochum Universitätsstraße 150 44801 Bochum Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3139/978344646133810.3139/9783446461338 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-662-63030-310.1007/978-3-662-63030-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.01110.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.011 ↗
4. 10.5402/2012/20876010.5402/2012/208760 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.14810.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148 ↗
6. Klahn C. · 2021
7. 10.1007/978-3-662-59789-710.1007/978-3-662-59789-7 ↗
8. Wohlers T. · 2023
9. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.69210.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.692 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1007078410.3390/polym10070784 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.10410.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.104 ↗
12. 10.1515/polyeng-2023-002810.1515/polyeng-2023-0028 ↗
13. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.1610.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.16 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.02210.1016/j.procir.2020.09.022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10609410.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106094 ↗
16. 10.2351/1.488393510.2351/1.4883935 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.01810.1016/j.procir.2020.09.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.07310.1016/j.procir.2024.08.073 ↗
19. 10.1002/adom.20200047310.1002/adom.202000473 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.480294910.1063/1.4802949 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.rechem.2020.10008510.1016/j.rechem.2020.100085 ↗
22. 10.1108/1355254091096029910.1108/13552540910960299 ↗
23. 10.1039/D0TC02740E10.1039/D0TC02740E ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0041410.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00414 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10721410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107214 ↗
26. 10.1002/adom.20190208710.1002/adom.201902087 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10421110.1016/j.addma.2024.104211 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.10310.1016/j.procir.2018.08.103 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831244181210.1177/0021998312441812 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.2345910.1002/pen.23459 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10948710.1016/j.matdes.2021.109487 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2025.10465510.1016/j.addma.2025.104655 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.07110.1016/j.procir.2024.08.071 ↗
34. 10.1021/la502588g10.1021/la502588g ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10141910.1016/j.addma.2020.101419 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsapm.4c0157310.1021/acsapm.4c01573 ↗
37. 10.1007/s13204-021-01693-y10.1007/s13204-021-01693-y ↗
38. 10.3390/ma1315331210.3390/ma13153312 ↗
39. Jenike A. W. · 1964
40. 10.1016/j.procir.2022.08.11410.1016/j.procir.2022.08.114 ↗
41. Kusoglu I. M. · Materials · 2021 · 14
42. 10.1002/cite.33046010210.1002/cite.330460102 ↗
43. 10.1524/zpch.218.1.51.2538810.1524/zpch.218.1.51.25388 ↗
44. ElenaOstas Dissertation Martin‐Luther‐Universität Halle‐Wittenberg2014.
45. 10.1134/S106378421008007410.1134/S1063784210080074 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.00710.1016/j.addma.2018.11.007 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10195710.1016/j.addma.2021.101957 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10396110.1016/j.addma.2024.103961 ↗
49. MariaTaplick Dissertation Universität Hamburg Hamburg2023.
50. 10.1002/adpr.20240020710.1002/adpr.202400207 ↗
51. 10.3390/ma1418532210.3390/ma14185322 ↗
52. 10.1364/OL.41.00148610.1364/OL.41.001486 ↗
53. 10.1002/smll.20220648510.1002/smll.202206485 ↗
54. 10.1007/978-3-662-58776-810.1007/978-3-662-58776-8 ↗