Creep‐Fatigue Life Prediction of 316H Stainless Steel through Physics‐Informed Data‐Driven Models
Source abstract
Abstract
316H stainless steel is a critical material for fourth‐generation nuclear reactors, yet it is prone to creep‐fatigue failure under high‐temperature and high‐pressure conditions. This study evaluates physics‐driven models (including time fraction model, ductile exhaustion model, modified strain energy density exhaustion model, and plastic strain energy model) and data‐driven models (including support vector regression, random forests, generalized regression neural networks, and backpropagation neural networks) for predicting the creep‐fatigue life of 316H base metal and welded joints. On the basis of data‐driven models, physical information from the creep‐fatigue damage is further integrated to embed the physics‐informed input features and the physics‐informed loss function, thereby constructing physics‐informed data‐driven models to predict creep‐fatigue life. Results demonstrate that physics‐informed data‐driven models significantly outperform conventional approaches, with the physics‐informed generalized regression neural network achieving the highest accuracy ( R 2 = 0.9277). This work provides a robust framework for enhancing life prediction in high‐temperature structural applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin 300350 P. R. China
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining Technology Tianjin 300350 P. R. China
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Roll Materials and Composite Forming School of Materials Science and Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin 300350 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.00910.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.009 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.73410.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.734 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.net.2021.05.02110.1016/j.net.2021.05.021 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.04410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.15275810.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152758 ↗
6. 10.13182/NT08-A396110.13182/NT08-A3961 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10477410.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104774 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10590010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105900 ↗
11. Robinson E. L. · Trans. ASME · 1952 · 74 · 777
12. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1983.tb00329.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1983.tb00329.x ↗
13. 10.1179/174328407X24392410.1179/174328407X243924 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.402443610.1115/1.4024436 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10623610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106236 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10685110.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106851 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41524-018-0094-710.1038/s41524-018-0094-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10693310.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106933 ↗
20. Xu Y. · Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao · 2022 · 56 · 267
21. 10.1115/1.403920410.1115/1.4039204 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00064-110.1016/S0142-1123(03)00064-1 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.10401410.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.104014 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.02110.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.021 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10750810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107508 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.10503910.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.105039 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10785010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107850 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10753610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107536 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10813010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108130 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.10985210.1016/j.ress.2023.109852 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11326710.1016/j.matdes.2024.113267 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10853-022-07998-910.1007/s10853-022-07998-9 ↗
33. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.353-358.19010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.353-358.190 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.11.01310.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.11.013 ↗
35. 10.1520/STP32428S10.1520/STP32428S ↗
36. 10.1007/s12666-010-0029-610.1007/s12666-010-0029-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00275-710.1016/S0029-5493(99)00275-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.05.00510.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.05.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10698910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106989 ↗
40. Feltham P. · J. Inst. Met. · 1960 · 89 · 210
41. 10.1016/0025-5416(81)90128-210.1016/0025-5416(81)90128-2 ↗
42. 10.3184/096034013X1375789093244210.3184/096034013X13757890932442 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.02810.1016/j.msea.2009.11.028 ↗
44. Sandor B. I. · 1972
45. 10.1520/STP43764S10.1520/STP43764S ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10722210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107222 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10703410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107034 ↗
48. B. Y.Rong H. R.Zhang G. L.Li F.Min inInt. Conf. on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) Shenzhen China2022 p.21.
49. 10.1016/j.compind.2023.10386010.1016/j.compind.2023.103860 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10955910.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109559 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10667710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106677 ↗
52. 10.1115/1.280699910.1115/1.2806999 ↗
53. Coffin L. F. · 1978