Intermetallic Compound Layer Morphology and Distribution in Friction‐Welded Steel–Aluminum Components
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the morphology, distribution, and local thickness of the intermetallic compound layer (IMC‐layer) in friction‐welded steel‐aluminum hybrid components used for Tailored Forming applications are investigated. By friction‐welding of steel and aluminum, which is the first step in the Tailored Forming process chain, an IMC‐layer in the joining zone is formed. In this study, the influence of friction‐welding parameters, such as rotational speed, friction pressure, friction length, upsetting pressure, and upsetting time, on local IMC‐layer thickness and distribution is examined. For characterization, a detailed analysis over the whole joining surface by means of scanning electron microscopy and a thorough statistical evaluation are employed. In the results, it is indicated that lower rotational speeds (700 rpm) in the friction phase result in more uniform and thinner IMC‐layer (<0.5 μm), while higher speeds (1600 rpm) produce a thicker and more heterogeneous IMC‐ layer (up to 0.9 μm). Tensile tests show that specimens with thinner mean IMC‐layer (0.17 μm) feature a higher tensile strength (244 MPa). The morphology and distribution of the IMC‐layer over the cross section of the friction‐welded specimen have a significant effect on the mechanical properties of the joint, with a uniform thin layer improving the tensile strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut für Werkstoffkunde (Materials Science) Leibniz Universität Hannover An der Universität 2 30825 Garbsen Germany
Institut für Umformtechnik und Umformmaschinen (Forming Technology and Machines) Leibniz Universität Hannover An der Universität 2 30825 Garbsen Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. B.‐A.Behrens A.Bouguecha M.Vucetic I.Peshekhodov T.Matthias N.Kolbasnikov S.Sokolov S.Ganin inProc. 2016 ESAFORM Conf. on Material Forming France2016.
2. 10.1007/s11740-020-00994-510.1007/s11740-020-00994-5 ↗
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.386510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.3865 ↗
4. 10.1080/10426914.2012.66312210.1080/10426914.2012.663122 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1044-5803(03)00051-210.1016/S1044-5803(03)00051-2 ↗
6. 10.13182/FST90-A3989210.13182/FST90-A39892 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.02410.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.024 ↗
8. 10.1179/02670839910150680510.1179/026708399101506805 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.03810.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.038 ↗
10. B.‐A.Behrens A.Chugreev T.Matthias inProc. 2018 ESAFORM Conf. on Material Forming Palermo Italy2018.
11. A.Piwek J.Peddinghaus J.Uhe K.Brunotte B.‐A.Behrens inProc. 2023 ESAFORM Conf. on Material Forming Kraków Poland2023.10.37904/metal.2023.4633 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.20710.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.207 ↗
13. A.Piwek J.Peddinghaus J.Uhe K.Brunotte inProc. 2023 METAL Brno Czech Republic2023 p.175.10.37904/metal.2023.4633 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.343948410.1115/1.3439484 ↗
15. A.Piwek J.Peddinghaus J.Uhe K.Brunotte inProc. 2024 ESAFORM Conf. on Material Forming Toulouse France2024.
16. Taban E. · Mater. Des. 1980–2015 · 2010 · 31 · 2305
17. 10.1007/s00170-020-05128-w10.1007/s00170-020-05128-w ↗
18. 10.1051/metal/202106710.1051/metal/2021067 ↗
19. 10.1007/s13632-017-0378-110.1007/s13632-017-0378-1 ↗
20. 10.1007/s13632-019-00605-510.1007/s13632-019-00605-5 ↗