Comparative Study of Room and Cryogenic Deformation Behavior of Additive Manufactured Ti–6Al–4V Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The microstructural evolution and underlaying deformation behavior of Ti–6Al–4V alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF‐Ti64) during room (RT) and cryogenic (CT: −150 °C) temperature are systematically investigated. LPBF‐Ti64 exhibits significantly higher strength at CT (yield strength [YS]: 1339 MPa, ultimate compressive strength [UCS]: 1982 MPa) as compared to RT (YS: 1013 MPa, UCS: 1690 MPa) with reduction in fracture strain. To probe the deformation mechanisms responsible for exceptionally higher strength at CT, LPBF‐Ti64 alloy is compressed to 10% strain at both temperatures and the underlaying strengthening mechanisms are investigated. Dislocation strengthening is emphasized to be the major strengthening mechanisms (1166/1359 MPa for RT‐10 and CT‐10, respectively). The significantly higher dislocation density at CT (3.73 10 16 m −2 for CT‐10 and 2.9 10 16 m −2 for RT‐10) is attributed to the restricted dislocation movement at low temperature, whereas dislocation nucleation during further deformation will multiply the dislocations interlocking and pinning, hence resulting in higher strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Incheon National University Incheon 22012 Republic of Korea
Research Institute for Engineering and Technology Incheon National University Incheon 22012 Republic of Korea
Additive Manufacturing Innovation Agency Korea Institute of Industrial Technology Gyeonggi 15014 Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea · Incheon National University
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-015-1759-z10.1007/s11837-015-1759-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.05410.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.00810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.008 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11661-020-05880-410.1007/s11661-020-05880-4 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-019-13874-z10.1038/s41467-019-13874-z ↗
6. 10.3390/met1307121410.3390/met13071214 ↗
7. Sabzi H. E. · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 34 · 101360
8. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.01410.1016/j.addma.2016.05.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.09.01110.1016/j.matdes.2010.09.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11083410.1016/j.matchar.2020.110834 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-410.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10664010.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106640 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.02810.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.028 ↗
15. 10.1557/mrs.2016.21510.1557/mrs.2016.215 ↗
16. 10.3390/met1008100610.3390/met10081006 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11665-017-2710-y10.1007/s11665-017-2710-y ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14225810.1016/j.msea.2021.142258 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14272910.1016/j.msea.2022.142729 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14295610.1016/j.msea.2022.142956 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11340310.1016/j.matchar.2023.113403 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14204210.1016/j.msea.2021.142042 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-022-07640-310.1038/s41598-022-07640-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14218910.1016/j.msea.2021.142189 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jma.2024.04.02110.1016/j.jma.2024.04.021 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11342310.1016/j.matchar.2023.113423 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1111220110.3390/ma11112201 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.11710.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.117 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11243410.1016/j.matchar.2022.112434 ↗
30. 10.1007/s12274-021-3719-y10.1007/s12274-021-3719-y ↗
31. 10.3390/cryst1101004210.3390/cryst11010042 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.05010.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.050 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.12510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.125 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.12210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.122 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.01910.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.019 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14223910.1016/j.msea.2021.142239 ↗
37. R.Walsh R.Mitchell V.Toplosky R.Gentzlinger inProc. of the IX Workshop on RF Superconductivity Santa Fe New Mexico USA1999.
38. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.16982810.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169828 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17263010.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172630 ↗