journal article·2024-07Open access

A Study of Microstructural Tensile and Fatigue Properties Coupled with Digital Image Correlation of Hybrid Manufactured Inconel 718 Parts by Extrusion and Powder Bed Fusion

Simon Malej, Joel Larsson, Johannes Gumpinger, Ana Brandão, Emilie Beevers, Tommaso Ghidini, Joe Bennett, Luca Patriarca, Wael Abuzaid, Stefano Beretta

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 13

Abstract

To overcome challenges associated with additive manufacturing (AM), a combination of AM and conventional manufacturing (CM) can be explored, enabling the production of hybrid structures. Nonetheless, realizing aerospace hybrid structures requires investigation into the process–structure–properties relationships of the AM and CM material and the interface zone between them. Herein, Inconel 718 is deposited onto extruded bars of the same material by powder bed fusion (PBF). The interface zone from the CM zone to the PBF zone is investigated using destructive and nondestructive testing. It is found that fractures during tensile tests occur in the CM zone. The PBF zone proves to be stronger than the CM zone (average yield strength of 1295 and 1167 MPa, respectively). A higher strength of PBF parts is related to the finer microstructure of δ‐phase precipitates and dendrite cell structure. The fatigue limit of the hybrid samples is high (Sa = 305 MPa, R = 0.1). Coupled fatigue and digital image correlation at the highest stress amplitude show distinctive plastic flow dominating the CM zone. In reverse, fracture of hybrid parts at lower stress amplitudes forms preferentially in the PBF zone because of process‐related defects (gas pores and lack of fusion).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

European Space Research and Technology Centre European Space Agency Keplerlaan 1 Noordwijk 2201 AZ The Netherlands

Balmar d.o.o. Kidriceva 24A 3000 Celje Slovenia

Department of Mechanical Engineering KU Leuven Celestijnenlaan 300 Leuven 3000 Belgium

Business and Innovations Directorate Science and Technology Facilities Council Fermi Ave, Harwell Didcot OX11 0FD UK

Department of Mechanical Engineering Politecnico di Milano Via La Masa 1 20156 Milano Italy

Department of Mechanical Engineering American University of Sharjah Sharjah 26666 United Arab Emirates

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.05710.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.057 ↗
3. 10.1080/0951192X.2012.74953010.1080/0951192X.2012.749530 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12567-022-00428-110.1007/s12567-022-00428-1 ↗
5. 10.1177/095440541561988310.1177/0954405415619883 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.09310.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.093 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.09.03110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.09.031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.10710.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.107 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.03210.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.032 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.03510.1016/j.msea.2015.05.035 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.10010.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.100 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11465-015-0341-210.1007/s11465-015-0341-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.00410.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.17110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.171 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.13610.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.136 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10580210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105802 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11084210.1016/j.matchar.2020.110842 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40964-021-00171-910.1007/s40964-021-00171-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.02.00310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.02.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.005 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170-022-09605-210.1007/s00170-022-09605-2 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1004034110.3390/ma10040341 ↗
25. B.Ahuja A.Schaub M.Karg R.Schmidt M.Merklein M.Schmidt inProc. SPIE 9353 Laser 3D Manufacturing II 93530X San Francisco CA March2015 Vol.9353 p.118.10.1117/12.2082919 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.06510.1016/j.msea.2016.12.065 ↗
27. U. O.Agwu R.Petruska K.Shimada J.Rome G.Bean S.Tai V.Goyal inAIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition AIAA SciTech Forum 2022 San Diego CA January2022.
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14331810.1016/j.msea.2022.143318 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16539810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165398 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11754210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117542 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cja.2013.02.02710.1016/j.cja.2013.02.027 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.08210.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.082 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.01910.1016/j.msea.2014.04.019 ↗
34. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.60910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.609 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165710.1016/j.addma.2020.101657 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00170-022-09004-710.1007/s00170-022-09004-7 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467-020-14453-310.1038/s41467-020-14453-3 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11086810.1016/j.matchar.2020.110868 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00170-017-1019-110.1007/s00170-017-1019-1 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11140310.1016/j.matchar.2021.111403 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-3-319-76651-5_410.1007/978-3-319-76651-5_4 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.00610.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.006 ↗
43. J. M.Moyer L. A.Jackman C. B.Adasczik R. M.Davis R.Forbes‐Jones inProc. of the Int. Symp. on Superalloys 718 625 706 and Various Derivatives Pittsburgh PA June1994 p.39.10.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_39_48 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10527910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105279 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10557210.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105572 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10539210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105392 ↗
47. 2008