journal article·2024-05Open access

Electro–Thermo–Mechanical Characterization of Shape Memory Alloy Wires for Actuator and Sensor Applications, Part 2: High‐Ambient‐Temperature Behavior

Dominik Scholtes, Stefan Seelecke, Paul Motzki

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 10

Abstract

The typical phase transformation temperatures of commercially available shape memory alloys (SMA) for actuator applications are in the region of 80–90 °C for austenite finish and around 60 °C for martensite start. That limits the areas of application for SMA actuators, as increased ambient temperatures restrict their functionality. Especially in the industrial and automotive sectors, operational temperatures of 80 °C and higher are commonly required. This article discusses the limits of operation temperatures for commercially available SMA actuator wires. Also, methods to increase this critical temperature limit, at which the SMA actuation strain falls below a certain threshold, are proposed. By means of electrothermal actuation experiments, the influence of the variation of bias loads and an additional training method are investigated. Supported by these results, an exemplary valve actuator system is designed, which exhibits consistent stroke in a wide range of ambient temperatures. All experiments and measurements are conducted on a custom designed test bench with the same commercially available SMA wire. The test bench is in the following used again to evaluate the designed SMA valve actuator.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Intelligent Materials Systems Lab Center for Mechatronics and Automation Technology ZeMA gGmbH 66121 Saarbrücken Germany

Intelligent Materials Systems Lab Department of Systems Engineering Department of Material Science and Engineering Saarland University 66123 Saarbrücken Germany

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/eng2.1286710.1002/eng2.12867 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1613482010.3390/ma16134820 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10973-009-0215-010.1007/s10973-009-0215-0 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11665-009-9407-910.1007/s11665-009-9407-9 ↗
5. Lagoudas D. C. · 2008
6. 10.1088/0964-1726/9/5/30810.1088/0964-1726/9/5/308 ↗
7. 10.1016/0029-8018(68)90019-X10.1016/0029-8018(68)90019-X ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.03.05110.1016/j.matpr.2018.03.051 ↗
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/09401210.1088/0964-1726/22/9/094012 ↗
10. C. H.Park Y. S.Son SMA spring‐based artificial muscle actuated by hot and cool water using faucet‐like valve ” in Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2017 SPIE2017 10164T https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2257467.10.1117/12.2257467 ↗
11. Actuator Solutions GmbH https://www.actuatorsolutions.de/english/products/(accessed: May 2023).
12. D.Scholtes S.Seelecke G.Rizzello P.Motzki inASME 2020 Conf. on Smart Materials Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems SMASIS 2020 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection2020.
13. A.Kazi M.Honold W.Rimkus T.Lokner M.Bäuml M.Köpfer inACTUATOR 2018 ‐ 16th Int. Conf. and Exhibition on New Actuators and Drive Systems VDE Bremen2018 pp.375–378.
14. 10.1002/adem.20220020510.1002/adem.202200205 ↗
15. 10.3390/s13101295810.3390/s131012958 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tca.2007.05.02410.1016/j.tca.2007.05.024 ↗
17. Takimoto A. · J. Phys. IV · 1995 · 05 · C8
18. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2008.00460.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2008.00460.x ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2008.00410.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2008.00410.x ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00619.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00619.x ↗
21. 10.1007/s10765-006-0060-310.1007/s10765-006-0060-3 ↗
22. Churchill C. B. · Behav. Mech. Multifunct. Compos. Mater. · 2008 · 6929 · 69291F
23. C. B.Churchill J. A.Shaw inProc. ASME Conf. Smart Mater. Adapt. Struct. Intell. Syst. 2009 SMASIS2009 Oxnard2009 pp.137–148.
24. 10.1177/1045389X1348671510.1177/1045389X13486715 ↗
25. 10.1557/PROC-246-32110.1557/PROC-246-321 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/4/4/01010.1088/0964-1726/4/4/010 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.00910.1016/j.msea.2012.10.009 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.400446010.1115/1.4004460 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep2111810.1038/srep21118 ↗
30. Camebridge Mechatronics – Actuators https://www.cambridgemechatronics.com/en/cml‐technology/actuators/(accessed: August 2023).
31. S. M.Kirsch F.Welsch D.Bevilacqua D.Naso S.Seelecke G.Rizzello P.Motzki in SMASIS 2020 ‐ Conf. on Smart Materials Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems2020.
32. Dynalloy http://www.dynalloy.com/pdfs/TCF1140.pdf(accessed: March 2019).
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.03.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.03.004 ↗
34. SAES Group https://www.saesgetters.com/sites/default/files/SMARTFLEXSPRINGSANDWIRES.pdf(accessed: July 2018).
35. 10.1007/978-3-319-19081-510.1007/978-3-319-19081-5 ↗
36. Tiboni M. · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. · 2011 · 225 · 443
37. S.Nalbach P.Motzki S.Seelecke inASME 2015 Conf. Smart Mater. Adapt. Struct. Intell. Syst. SMASIS 2015 Coloardo Springs2016.
38. J.Mayer P.Molitor Y.Goergen P.Motzki inProc. ASME 2022 Conf. Smart Mater. Adapt. Struct. Intell. Syst. SMASIS 2022 Dearborn2022.
39. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.60710.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.607 ↗
40. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03500510.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035005 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.32710.1016/j.msea.2003.10.327 ↗
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/8/08502110.1088/0964-1726/18/8/085021 ↗
43. 10.1007/s40830-022-00404-y10.1007/s40830-022-00404-y ↗
44. 10.1007/s40830-024-00473-110.1007/s40830-024-00473-1 ↗