journal article·2025-05Open access

Ti6Al4V Components by Bound Metal Deposition and Competitive with Metal Injection Molded Parts: Optimization of the Printing Parameters

Claudia Sergi, Alessandra Martucci, Manuela Galati, Mariangela Lombardi, Edoardo Rossi, Marco Sebastiani, Lavinia Tonelli, Lorella Ceschini, Jacopo Tirillò, Fabrizio Sarasini

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 27· Issue 10

Abstract

Bound metal deposition (BMD) is a valid 3D printing solution from an economic perspective. Still, the resulting mechanical properties are intrinsically lower than selective laser melting and electron beam melting ones and, in some cases, are also lower than metal injection molding (MIM). The optimization of the printing parameters is fundamental to level off this issue and to ensure mechanical performance competitive with MIM ones. In light of this, the present work focuses, for the first time, on the optimization of the printing parameters for a Ti6Al4V alloy. The effect of three fundamental parameters, that is, layer thickness, nozzle temperature, and printing speed, is investigated, and the 3D printing process is optimized by exploiting the design of experiment and the surface response analysis techniques. The results are extremely auspicious, considering that the optimum configurations display a tensile strength of 915 MPa, which is perfectly comparable with MIM components. The statistical analysis demonstrates that nozzle temperature, printing speed, and their interaction are the most relevant parameters and the 3D printing optimum is achieved with a nozzle temperature of 160 °C and a printing speed of 15 mm s−1.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering Materials Environment Sapienza Università di Roma and UdR INSTM Via Eudossiana 18 00184 Rome Italy

Department of Applied Science and Technology Politecnico di Torino Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24 10129 Turin Italy

Department of Management and Production Engineering Politecnico di Torino Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24 10129 Turin Italy

Integrated Additive Manufacturing Center Politecnico di Torino Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24 10129 Turin Italy

Department of Civil, Computer Science and Aeronautical Technologies Engineering Roma Tre University Via Vito Volterra 62 00146 Rome Italy

Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN) Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna Viale del Risorgimento 2 40136 Bologna Italy

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cie.2021.10774610.1016/j.cie.2021.107746 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.orp.2021.10020110.1016/j.orp.2021.100201 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814062-8.00002-910.1016/B978-0-12-814062-8.00002-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.59610.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.596 ↗
6. Dalpadulo E. · J. Manuf. Mater. Process. · 2022 · 6 · 133
7. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.10768910.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689 ↗
8. Leary M. · 2019
9. 10.1007/s40964-023-00395-x10.1007/s40964-023-00395-x ↗
10. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.03110.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.01810.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.018 ↗
13. Formlabs 3D Printing Technology Comparison: FDM vs. SLA vs. SLS2023 https://formlabs.com/blog/fdm‐vs‐sla‐vs‐sls‐how‐to‐choose‐the‐right‐3d‐printing‐technology/(accessed: April 2025).
14. Markforged Types of 3D Printing in Metal2023 https://markforged.com/resources/learn/design‐for‐additive‐manufacturing‐metals/metal‐additive‐manufacturing‐introduction/types‐of‐3d‐printing‐metal?__geom=✪(accessed: April 2025).
15. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10070710.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707 ↗
16. C.Cavallo All About Binder Jetting 3D Printing2023 https://www.thomasnet.com/articles/custom‐manufacturing‐fabricating/all‐about‐binder‐jetting‐3d‐printing/(accessed: March 2025).
17. Pick3DPrinter 2023 Best Binder Jetting 3D Printer–Pros and Cons & Buying Guide2023 https://pick3dprinter.com/binder‐jetting‐3d‐printer/(accessed: April 2025).
18. Bocchini G. F. · SAE Trans. · 1986 · 95 · 790
19. Spiller S. · Proc. Struct. Integr. · 2022 · 41 · 158
20. 10.1533/9780857098900.1.10910.1533/9780857098900.1.109 ↗
21. 10.1533/9780857098900.4.52010.1533/9780857098900.4.520 ↗
22. 10.1533/9780857096234.1.10910.1533/9780857096234.1.109 ↗
23. 10.1016/B978-0-12-812456-7.00024-X10.1016/B978-0-12-812456-7.00024-X ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.22710.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.227 ↗
25. 10.3390/met1203042910.3390/met12030429 ↗
26. 10.3390/polym1416326410.3390/polym14163264 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.00810.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.008 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40964-021-00167-510.1007/s40964-021-00167-5 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1608316210.3390/ma16083162 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10125610.1016/j.addma.2020.101256 ↗
31. M. K.Dunstana J. D.Paramore B. G.Butler Z. Z.Fang inMATEC Web of Conf. The 14th World Conf. on Titanium Nantes France2020 p.03003.10.1051/matecconf/202032103003 ↗
32. U.Viehöfer W.Winkelmüller M.Lang M.Scharvogel Method for the Powder‐Metallurgical Production of Components from Titanium or Titanium Alloys EP 3 231 536 A1 2017.
33. 10.1016/j.cossms.2023.10110710.1016/j.cossms.2023.101107 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.10499010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104990 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.13710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.10078010.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100780 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1518644210.3390/ma15186442 ↗
38. 10.1179/174329008X27169110.1179/174329008X271691 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.10.03910.1016/j.msea.2008.10.039 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.12.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.12.001 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.07010.1016/j.msea.2010.02.070 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.19210.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.192 ↗
43. 10.1115/1.402577310.1115/1.4025773 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.02810.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.028 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.07.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.07.015 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00204-210.1016/S0257-8972(99)00204-2 ↗
47. 10.3139/217.008410.3139/217.0084 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13998110.1016/j.msea.2020.139981 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.05.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.05.015 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.03.04210.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.03.042 ↗
51. 10.22226/2410-3535-2015-1-67-6910.22226/2410-3535-2015-1-67-69 ↗
52. 10.1007/s11661-008-9643-x10.1007/s11661-008-9643-x ↗
53. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.00510.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.005 ↗
54. 10.1557/jmr.2011.33410.1557/jmr.2011.334 ↗