Corrosion Behavior of Cobalt–Chromium‐Based Laser Claddings Reinforced with Boron Nitride, Graphene Oxide, and Graphite.
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, the corrosion resistance of a cobalt–chromium‐based laser cladding reinforced with different microparticles: boron nitride, graphene oxide, and graphite, added for increased tribological performance, is explored. Samples are fabricated by premixing cobalt–chromium powder with microparticle additions and cladding onto 316L stainless steel base metal. The corrosion behavior is measured in industrially relevant applications: 1 m acetic acid and 3.5 wt% NaCl, using open‐circuit potential, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, linear polarization resistance, and cyclic polarization. Laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry is used to analyze the distribution of the chemical elements throughout the coatings. The reference cladding's corrosion resistance is outstanding in both electrolytes, with a corrosion rate (CR) of ≤0.19 μm year −1 and no pitting tendencies. With the addition of microparticles, the claddings maintain their remarkable pitting resistance, but show an increase in CR up to 0.98 μm year −1 due to the nonuniform distribution of the microparticles into the matrix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Know‐How Innovative Solutions & Manufacturing Avda. De la Agricultura 16A 33211 Gijón Spain
Materials Science Program Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331 USA
Department of Marine Science and Technology University of Oviedo 33203 Gijón Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Fayaz G. · 2021
2. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10628710.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106287 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12869810.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128698 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12782210.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127822 ↗
5. 10.1179/174951409X1254226451384310.1179/174951409X12542264513843 ↗
6. 10.5006/426810.5006/4268 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11665-014-0887-x10.1007/s11665-014-0887-x ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.02910.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.029 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.15610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.156 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10164810.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101648 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)15485-X10.1016/S1452-3981(23)15485-X ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.76310.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.763 ↗
13. 10.1002/maco.20090538610.1002/maco.200905386 ↗
14. Mauziri T. · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2020 · 22 · 12
15. Zhang L. · Medziagotyra · 2022 · 28 · 280
16. 10.1007/s11665-021-05704-510.1007/s11665-021-05704-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.triboint.2021.10714210.1016/j.triboint.2021.107142 ↗
18. Handbook C. A. I. · 2004 · 2733
19. 10.1080/1042691080231710210.1080/10426910802317102 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00735-010.1016/S0257-8972(00)00735-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.09.03110.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.09.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10578910.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105789 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.03.04810.1016/j.optlastec.2019.03.048 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.06110.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.061 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.11810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.118 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.26610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.266 ↗
27. 10.3390/coatings902010910.3390/coatings9020109 ↗
28. 10.1134/S0031918X1908009X10.1134/S0031918X1908009X ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10795910.1016/j.matdes.2019.107959 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12653410.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126534 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.08310.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.083 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.00910.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.009 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14447010.1016/j.msea.2022.144470 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12913910.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.129139 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11837-019-03865-210.1007/s11837-019-03865-2 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.006 ↗
37. 10.3390/coatings1011104810.3390/coatings10111048 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.02.01110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.02.011 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11661-020-05805-110.1007/s11661-020-05805-1 ↗
40. 10.1007/s40195-021-01215-310.1007/s40195-021-01215-3 ↗
41. 10.3390/ma1522821910.3390/ma15228219 ↗
42. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2022.3610.3144/expresspolymlett.2022.36 ↗
43. 10.1021/am400016y10.1021/am400016y ↗
44. Gyawali G. · ECS Electrochem. Lett. · 2013 · 2 · 2013
45. 10.1007/s12274-016-1393-210.1007/s12274-016-1393-2 ↗
46. H.Li J.Pu R.Zhang Authors : Surf.Topogr.:Metrol.Prop.2019 7 045022.10.1088/2051-672X/ab58bd ↗
47. 10.1021/nn203507y10.1021/nn203507y ↗
48. 10.1515/corrrev-2020-008010.1515/corrrev-2020-0080 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.02210.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.022 ↗
50. 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)15058-910.1016/S1452-3981(23)15058-9 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10812910.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108129 ↗
52. ASTM international, G61‐86 Standard Test Method for conducting Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements for Localized Corrosion Susceptibility of Iron, Nickel or Cobalt Based Alloys · Annu. B. ASTM Stand. · 2010 · 86 · 1
53. 2015 · 1
54. ASTM international · 1985 · 505
55. ASTM E407‐07 Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys.2015.
56. 10.1039/B606988F10.1039/B606988F ↗
57. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.12216210.1016/j.talanta.2021.122162 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16030610.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160306 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.11.00110.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.11.001 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11673410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116734 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.26010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.260 ↗
62. ASTM‐Standards · 1999 · 1
63. 10.1134/S207020511805026X10.1134/S207020511805026X ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.00410.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.004 ↗
65. Lin Y. · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 22
66. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11650910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116509 ↗