Mechanical Behaviour, Contact Pose Estimation, and Finite Element Analysis of Vision Based Tactile Sensors Fabricated by Molding and Direct Ink Writing: A Comparative Study
Source abstract
Abstract
This work pioneers the application of direct ink writing (DIW) to fabricate elastomeric additively manufactured vision based tactile sensor (VBTS). DIW cuts down the fabrication time by 76%, allowing design precise control and reducing the complexities of the process compared to the state‐of‐the‐art (SOTA) molding techniques. Successful fabrication of DIW sensor is verified in three stages. Firstly, the mechanical characteristics of the DIW sensor are at par with those of SOTA molded Ecoflex in terms of depth of compression, compression rate, and the number of cycles. Secondly, using robotic pose estimation as a demonstration, the force enables deformation in the DIW sensor shows comparable normality estimation performance to that of the SOTA Ecoflex with a mean absolute error of less than 0.6°. Thirdly, finite element analysis (FEA) of DIW and SOTA Ecoflex sensors using Yeoh model shows similar stress and strain distributions as another evidence of DIW deformability and durability signaling sensor's successful fabrication.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Research and Innovation Center (ARIC) Khalifa University of Science and Technology Abu Dhabi 127788 United Arab Emirates
Department of Aerospace Engineering Khalifa University Abu Dhabi 127788 United Arab Emirates
Cambridge Graphene Center University of Cambridge Cambridge CB3 0FA UK
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/admt.20210001810.1002/admt.202100018 ↗
2. 10.1109/TRO.2021.311178610.1109/TRO.2021.3111786 ↗
3. 10.1007/s43154-021-00065-210.1007/s43154-021-00065-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10313910.1016/j.addma.2022.103139 ↗
5. 10.1109/MRA.2010.93786110.1109/MRA.2010.937861 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.robot.2010.06.00210.1016/j.robot.2010.06.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.01510.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.015 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_6110.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_61 ↗
9. 10.1002/rcs.209610.1002/rcs.2096 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20220693910.1002/adfm.202206939 ↗
11. 10.1002/aisy.20190016110.1002/aisy.201900161 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0643210.1021/acsnano.2c06432 ↗
13. 10.1039/C7MH00262A10.1039/C7MH00262A ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colcom.2015.02.00110.1016/j.colcom.2015.02.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compag.2023.10825610.1016/j.compag.2023.108256 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8TB01063C10.1039/C8TB01063C ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140582610.1002/adma.201405826 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-017-07360-z10.1038/s41598-017-07360-z ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20150007210.1002/adma.201500072 ↗
20. 10.1002/admt.20170023210.1002/admt.201700232 ↗
21. 10.1109/LRA.2023.333939710.1109/LRA.2023.3339397 ↗
22. G.Yang Q.Ye W.He L.Zhou X.Chen L.Yu W.Yang S.Chen W.Li inIEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops Long Beach CA June 2019 pp.1707–1708.10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00219 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1423509710.3390/polym14235097 ↗
24. 10.3390/s2211419610.3390/s22114196 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10846-021-01431-010.1007/s10846-021-01431-0 ↗
26. 10.1109/LRA.2020.297725710.1109/LRA.2020.2977257 ↗
27. 10.1117/1.JMM.15.3.03400510.1117/1.JMM.15.3.034005 ↗
28. K.Kumagai K.Shimonomura in2019 IEEE World Haptics Conf. WHC Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. Tokyo Japan July2019 pp.343–348.10.1109/WHC.2019.8816132 ↗
29. 10.1038/s42256-021-00439-310.1038/s42256-021-00439-3 ↗
30. 10.3390/s2105192010.3390/s21051920 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00170-021-07669-010.1007/s00170-021-07669-0 ↗
32. 10.1109/LRA.2021.310405710.1109/LRA.2021.3104057 ↗
33. 10.3390/s2218699810.3390/s22186998 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17139010.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171390 ↗
35. Ohka M. · J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. · 2008 · 2
36. R.Li E. H.Adelson inProc. of the IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2013. Oregon Convention Center in Portland Oregon. The month is June.
37. 10.3390/s1904092810.3390/s19040928 ↗
38. 10.1109/TII.2021.313041110.1109/TII.2021.3130411 ↗
39. 10.1109/TIE.2020.297754110.1109/TIE.2020.2977541 ↗
40. 10.1002/admt.20180036510.1002/admt.201800365 ↗
41. 10.1002/advs.20210514610.1002/advs.202105146 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.10.05110.1016/j.sna.2015.10.051 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11313310.1016/j.sna.2021.113133 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e0037210.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00372 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10845-019-01481-010.1007/s10845-019-01481-0 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.01510.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.015 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.clay.2023.10685410.1016/j.clay.2023.106854 ↗
48. 10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01175-X10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01175-X ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.03910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.039 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.10.00210.1016/j.medengphy.2014.10.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.08910.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10126810.1016/j.addma.2020.101268 ↗
53. 10.1002/admt.20190027510.1002/admt.201900275 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10288810.1016/j.jddst.2021.102888 ↗
55. 10.1080/17452759.2017.132672410.1080/17452759.2017.1326724 ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20170121810.1002/adma.201701218 ↗
57. 10.1080/17452759.2023.227914910.1080/17452759.2023.2279149 ↗
58. 10.1002/admt.20200111510.1002/admt.202001115 ↗
59. 10.1039/C7NR01865G10.1039/C7NR01865G ↗
60. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.306028110.1109/JSEN.2021.3060281 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11275310.1016/j.sna.2021.112753 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10332010.1016/j.addma.2022.103320 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10360110.1016/j.addma.2023.103601 ↗
64. 10.1109/TRO.2020.303125110.1109/TRO.2020.3031251 ↗
65. Q. K.Luu D. Q.Nguyen N. H.Nguyen V. A.Ho in2023 IEEE Int. Conf. on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) IEEE Singapore Singapore April2023.
66. 10.1002/adma.20230791710.1002/adma.202307917 ↗
67. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.332493010.1109/JSEN.2023.3324930 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10301910.1016/j.addma.2022.103019 ↗
69. 10.1002/adem.20170034110.1002/adem.201700341 ↗
70. 10.1002/adma.20210885510.1002/adma.202108855 ↗
71. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819535-2.00013-210.1016/B978-0-12-819535-2.00013-2 ↗
72. M.Halwani A.Ayyad L.AbuAssi Y.Abdulrahman F.Almaskari H.Hassanin A.Abusafieh Y.Zweiri A Novel Vision‐Based Multi‐Functional Sensor for Normality and Position Measurements in Precise Robotic Manufacturing Available at SSRN 4360666 2023.10.2139/ssrn.4360666 ↗
73. 10.3390/s2314645110.3390/s23146451 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10239310.1016/j.addma.2021.102393 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10139510.1016/j.addma.2020.101395 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10210810.1016/j.addma.2021.102108 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10139310.1016/j.addma.2020.101393 ↗
78. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.307681510.1109/JSEN.2021.3076815 ↗