Sound Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Metal Powder Chamber Structures Composite Materials Formed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Granular damping technology is a widely used method in aerospace and other industries to reduce vibration and noise. However, the technique still faces challenges such as secondary processing, additional structure, single structure, and residual stress. This article introduces a new composite material, the metal powder chamber structure (MPCS), formed through the laser powder bed fusion technology. The article explores the effects of factors like arrangement mode, volume fraction, and powder chamber diameter on the sound and mechanical properties of MPCS. The study shows that MPCS improves the sound insulation effect of the material and defies the mass law of sound insulation. The sample 4B40 using a body‐centered cubic arrangement has a sound insulation coefficient of 52 dB. The sound absorption efficiency curve presents a double peak, and the sample 6F60 exhibits the highest sound absorption efficiency of 0.76. MPCS changes the deformation stage of the material stress–strain curve, and different MPCS also alters the compression deformation mode of the composite material. By studying the effects of MPCS on sound and mechanical properties, it is hoped to provide a better and more sustainable solution for vibration and noise reduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yantai Research Institute and Graduate School of Harbin Engineering University Yantai 264000 China
Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials & Surface Technology Ministry of Education College of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering Harbin Engineering University Harbin 150001 China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Standard A · 2012
2. 10.1007/978-3-030-56127-710.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 ↗
3. Kumar S. · Int. J. Innovative Res. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 3 · 147
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-981-13-8281-910.1007/978-981-13-8281-9 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20230041910.1002/adem.202300419 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2787910.1002/pc.27879 ↗
8. 10.1002/cpe.472510.1002/cpe.4725 ↗
9. 10.1002/advs.20230523210.1002/advs.202305232 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.05.00310.1016/j.mfglet.2020.05.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.13410.1016/j.procir.2023.03.134 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.physb.2006.12.04610.1016/j.physb.2006.12.046 ↗
13. A. C.Slagle C. R.Fuller in21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf.Dalls TX2015.
14. 10.1002/admt.20210069810.1002/admt.202100698 ↗
15. Ma F. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 129
16. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.10905910.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109059 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01388-310.1016/S0022-460X(02)01388-3 ↗
18. 10.3390/app1202067110.3390/app12020671 ↗
19. Prasad B. B. · Noise Control Eng. J. · 2021 · 263 · 71
20. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.02410.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.024 ↗
21. 10.1177/107754631663293210.1177/1077546316632932 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.11.02910.1016/j.powtec.2021.11.029 ↗
23. 10.1115/GT2018-7597710.1115/GT2018-75977 ↗
24. Scott‐Emuakpor O. · AIAA · 2019
25. 10.2514/1.J05960810.2514/1.J059608 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10173910.1016/j.addma.2020.101739 ↗
27. 10.2514/1.J05970910.2514/1.J059709 ↗
28. Scott‐Emuakpor O. E. · AIAA · 2019
29. Jin D. · 2005
30. Wolf N. D. · 1962
31. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.07.01610.1016/j.jsv.2012.07.016 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11256610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112566 ↗