Cold Crucible Induction Melting for the Fabrication of Fe–xTiC In Situ Metal Matrix Composites: Alloying Efficiency and Microstructural Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Fe–xTiC in situ metal matrix composites (MMCs) are fabricated utilizing a cold crucible inductive melting (CCIM) technique with varying TiC amounts (2, 3.5, and 5 wt%). Steel blocks and pure Ti plates are remelted in a water‐cooled copper crucible. The subsequent solidification of [Ti]‐ and [C]‐rich melt yields TiC reinforcement particles in an ingot. The holding time varies between 5 and 30 min, whereas the holding temperature alters depending on the amount of TiC, ranging from 1380 to 1620 °C for Fe‐5TiC and Fe‐2TiC, respectively. Alloying efficiency for TiC‐forming elements is estimated for all fabricated Fe–xTiC ingots by comparing [Ti] and [C] target values with measured ones. The lower TiC amounts and shorter holding times result in decreased [Ti] and [C] losses. SEM analysis of three cross‐section samples representing different TiC amounts reveals two distinct morphologies of TiC in situ reinforcements: primary blocky/cubic and eutectic plate‐like precipitates. The blocky precipitates appear slightly finer with a decrease in TiC amount (4.4 ± 1.2 μm for Fe‐5TiC and 3.8 ± 0.7 μm for Fe‐2TiC), whereas the length of plate‐like precipitates noticeably decreases in the samples with lower TiC amounts (11.0 ± 7.0 μm for Fe‐5TiC and 6.8 ± 3.6 μm for Fe‐2TiC).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Iron and Steel Technology TU Bergakademie Freiberg Leipziger Str. 34 09599 Freiberg Germany
Institute of Materials Science Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg Gustav-Zeuner Str. 5 09599 Freiberg Germany
Funding
Europäischer Sozialfonds · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:101794720649010.1023/A:1017947206490 ↗
2. Bauccio M. · 1994
3. 10.1023/A:101969920500310.1023/A:1019699205003 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-310.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.04710.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.047 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0072335910.1007/BF00723359 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.12.00710.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.12.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90232-R10.1016/0921-5093(90)90232-R ↗
9. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)90903-210.1016/0921-5093(94)90903-2 ↗
10. 10.1080/1042691050047147410.1080/10426910500471474 ↗
11. 10.1515/afe-2016-003210.1515/afe-2016-0032 ↗
12. 10.1179/02670839910150590510.1179/026708399101505905 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apm.2006.03.00310.1016/j.apm.2006.03.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10829510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108295 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14427910.1016/j.msea.2022.144279 ↗
16. 10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200003)2:3<85::AID-ADEM85>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200003)2:3<85::AID-ADEM85>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
17. 10.1007/s11661-997-0160-010.1007/s11661-997-0160-0 ↗
18. Niu H. Z. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 532 · 522
19. 10.1179/026708310X1269949846292210.1179/026708310X12699498462922 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20200071710.1002/adem.202000717 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.08710.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.087 ↗
22. 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-53510.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-535 ↗
23. 10.1361/105994906X10858510.1361/105994906X108585 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11661-997-0148-910.1007/s11661-997-0148-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14113010.1016/j.msea.2021.141130 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16628110.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166281 ↗