journal article·2023-04

Determination of Cyclic Load Limits for Plasma‐Sprayed Copper Tracks on Material Extrusion‐Based Printed Surfaces

Tanja Stiller, Andreas Hausberger, Michael Berer, Alexander M. Schwan, Andreas Hinterer, Sebastian Spalt, Gerald Pinter, Jürgen M. Lackner

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, copper particles are deposited on additively manufactured surfaces and investigations are performed to determine the mechanical properties and the impact of copper tracks on the surfaces. The basic investigation covers quasistatic tests, namely, tensile and three point bending, for three different printing orientations and two infill variations (+45°/−45° and 0°/90°), which shows no remarkable differences. In addition, a copper track is sprayed via atmospheric pressure plasma spraying (APPS) onto the polymeric samples and characterized regarding hardness and electric conductivity. Furthermore, a specific application for the copper track on the polymer substrate is recreated by a cyclic three point bending with a novel sample geometry (T‐shaped). The sprayed copper track has 60% of the hardness and 40% of the indentation modulus of bulk copper. Depending on the substrates’ topography, the electric conductivity varies from 7% to 18% of bulk copper. The lifetime of the copper track (i.e., conductivity) is strongly dependent on the deformation and the fracture of the polymer underneath. The underlying failure mechanism is triggered either by the topography of the polymer substrate or as a consequence of the damage in the copper track, leading to superficial cracks in the polymer surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH Roseggerstraße 12 8700 Leoben Austria

Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Leonhardstraße 59 8010 Graz Austria

INOCON Technologie GmbH Wiener Straße 3 4800 Attnang-Puchheim Austria

Materials Science and Testing of Polymers (Montanuniversitaet Leoben) Otto‐Glöckel‐Straße 2 8700 Leoben Austria

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
4. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2014-004810.1108/RPJ-04-2014-0048 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.00310.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.10015510.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100155 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.5161810.1002/app.51618 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10684110.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106841 ↗
9. 10.1108/1355254051057336510.1108/13552540510573365 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10167110.1016/j.addma.2020.101671 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10257710.1016/j.addma.2021.102577 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165810.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.00910.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.00810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.08.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.08.008 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1102021610.3390/ma11020216 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1102026510.3390/ma11020265 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.11.007 ↗
21. 10.3390/app1009319510.3390/app10093195 ↗
22. 10.3390/app1009317010.3390/app10093170 ↗
23. Froes F. H. · 2019
24. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.11.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10881010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108810 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.4540110.1002/app.45401 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.00910.1016/j.addma.2018.06.009 ↗
29. 10.3390/s2016454210.3390/s20164542 ↗
30. K. B.Perez C. B.Williams 24th International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp.—An Additive Manufacturing Conf. University of Texas2013 pp.962–979.
31. 10.1051/mfreview/201601110.1051/mfreview/2016011 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10154410.1016/j.addma.2020.101544 ↗
33. 10.1088/1757-899X/480/1/01201610.1088/1757-899X/480/1/012016 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00170-014-5717-710.1007/s00170-014-5717-7 ↗
35. 10.1080/14658011.2017.141816510.1080/14658011.2017.1418165 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.10.002 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.03810.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.038 ↗
38. 10.1002/978111874730810.1002/9781118747308 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.sab.2005.10.00310.1016/j.sab.2005.10.003 ↗
40. 10.3139/978344643064810.3139/9783446430648 ↗
41. Friedrich J. · 2018
42. 10.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/00610.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/006 ↗
43. 10.1557/JMR.2003.037610.1557/JMR.2003.0376 ↗
44. 10.3390/ma1105084010.3390/ma11050840 ↗
45. Heimann R. B. · 2008
46. Binder K. · 2012
47. http://www.impact-innovations.com/de/coldgas/process.html(accessed: June 2022).
48. Bobzin K. · 2013
49. 10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/30810.1088/0022-3727/34/18/308 ↗
50. 10.1088/0022-3727/44/3/03400110.1088/0022-3727/44/3/034001 ↗
51. Leterrier Y. · 2004
52. Lide D. R. · 2003
53. 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.06.00510.1016/j.matchar.2006.06.005 ↗
54. 10.1007/978-0-387-22462-610.1007/978-0-387-22462-6 ↗
55. 10.3139/978344642967310.3139/9783446429673 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15156810.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151568 ↗
57. Davis J. R. · 2001
58. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.10883410.1016/j.vacuum.2019.108834 ↗
59. 10.1007/s11666-016-0415-710.1007/s11666-016-0415-7 ↗
60. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000027010.1179/1743294414Y.0000000270 ↗
61. 10.1179/1743280414Y.000000002910.1179/1743280414Y.0000000029 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.00710.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.007 ↗
63. 10.1016/0040-6090(89)90030-810.1016/0040-6090(89)90030-8 ↗
64. 10.1179/02670840110151794410.1179/026708401101517944 ↗