journal article·2020-04

Stacking Faults and Growth Twins in Long‐Period Stacking‐Ordered Structures in Mg–Co–Y Alloys

Qianqian Jin, Xiaohong Shao, Zhenzhen Peng, Yangtao Zhou, Bo Zhang, Shijian Zheng, Xiuliang Ma

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 22· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, by atomic‐scale high‐angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy, the structure, symmetry, and distribution of stacking faults (SFs) and growth twins in 12H, 15R, and 18R long‐period stacking‐ordered (LPSO) structures in Mg88Co5Y7 and Mg92Co2Y6 (at%) as‐cast alloys are characterized. The SFs or growth twins in LPSO structures are denoted as the faulted arrangement of n‐Mg components, and some of them possess inversion centers or mirror symmetry. The formation of SFs or growth twins in 15R and 18R structures depends on whether the sum of Mg layers in all the n‐Mg components of the defect is an even number or an odd number, whereas only SFs form in 12H structures. Various types of SFs or SFs of the same kind can distribute locally in the LPSO structures in Mg–Co–Y alloys, and then some other LPSO structures with a longer period are detected via orderly distribution of SFs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science Institute of Metal Research Chinese Academy of Sciences 72 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016 China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Hebei University of Science and Technology Shijiazhuang Hebei 050018 China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Research Institute for Energy Equipment Materials Hebei University of Technology Tianjin 300130 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2320/matertrans.42.117210.2320/matertrans.42.1172 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.01110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.011 ↗
3. 10.2320/matertrans.MER200714210.2320/matertrans.MER2007142 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.00110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.01.10210.1016/j.msea.2019.01.102 ↗
6. 10.1007/s40195-018-0862-x10.1007/s40195-018-0862-x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.05410.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.054 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.03710.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.037 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.01210.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.012 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853-011-5899-410.1007/s10853-011-5899-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.01110.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.04810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.048 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.01010.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.10.04010.1016/j.msea.2004.10.040 ↗
16. 10.1002/adem.20180073410.1002/adem.201800734 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.14510.1016/j.msea.2003.10.145 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.03310.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.033 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.013 ↗
20. 10.1080/14786435.2016.124190910.1080/14786435.2016.1241909 ↗
21. 10.1080/09500839.2011.60914910.1080/09500839.2011.609149 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.03010.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.02510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.025 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.27910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.279 ↗
25. 10.1080/09500839.2017.131142610.1080/09500839.2017.1311426 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.01510.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.015 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.116764110.1126/science.1167641 ↗
28. 10.1038/nature1172810.1038/nature11728 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.199727710.1063/1.1997277 ↗
30. Zhang H. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2019
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.00210.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.002 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.06110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.061 ↗