journal article·2017-10Open access

Effects of Void Array Orientation on Compressive Properties of Cellular Structures

Karl Laurence Dahm, Peter Norman McGavin, Ian Willian Murray Brown

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 19· Issue 10

Abstract

Additively manufactured cellular materials enable customized structural implants with superior osseointegration potential and mechanical properties better matched to bone. In this investigation, the compression response of Ti–6Al–4V alloy cellular materials comprising a simple cubic array of 2.00 mm diameter spherical voids with a 1.90 mm inter‐void spacing are studied. Finite element analysis (FEA) shows that the lattice exhibited cubic symmetry with values for Young's modulus (E), Poisson's ratio, and shear modulus in the range of 28.5–29.5 GPa, 0.18–0.20, and 5.4–6.0 GPa, respectively. Compression tests carried out on cylinders with the same cellular structure fabricated by selective laser melting also show a strong dependence of elastic and plastic properties on orientation. Compression normal to the {100} plane of the simple cubic cell gives the highest E and strength, while compression normal to the {110} and {111} planes give lower values. The experimental E values for the {100} and {111} orientations show good agreement with the FEA results, but the {110} orientation shows lower values of E compared to the FEA predictions. Ultimate compressive failure of the cylinders occurred by gross slip along the {100} planes of the void array – coinciding with the slip planes for the simple cubic system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Callaghan Innovation Research and Technical Services Group 69 Gracefield Road Lower Hutt 5010 New Zealand

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/mawe.20100070110.1002/mawe.201000701 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
3. 10.3390/met504190210.3390/met5041902 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800054-0.00028-910.1016/B978-0-12-800054-0.00028-9 ↗
5. Brown I. W. M. · 2014
6. Brown I. · 2015
7. Grenestedt J. L. · 1998 · 3
8. Dieter G. E. · 1988
9. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.04.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.04.003 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11465-015-0341-210.1007/s11465-015-0341-2 ↗
11. 10.6028/jres.119.01910.6028/jres.119.019 ↗
12. Leicht A. · 2015
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.08610.1016/j.msea.2014.07.086 ↗
14. ASTM E9‐09 Standard Test Methods of Compression Testing of Metallic Materials at Room Temperature ASTM International West Conshohocken PA2009.
15. 10.1007/s00419-015-1102-810.1007/s00419-015-1102-8 ↗