Regulating the Tensile Properties of a Nano‐Lamellar Austenitic Stainless Steel via Cryogenic Electropulsing
Source abstract
Abstract
Electropulsing treatment (EPT) in the liquid nitrogen (LN) circumstances, referred to as LN‐EPT, is utilized to regulate the microstructure and tensile properties of a cold‐rolled 316L austenitic stainless steel. The electropulsing effects between the samples treated in the ambient environment at room temperature (RT) and in the LN temperature are compared. The results confirm that the LN‐EPT‐processed samples can also realize a fully recrystallized microstructure, and even the Joule heat is significantly suppressed compared with the RT‐EPT samples. The tensile properties of the LN‐EPT samples show both higher yield strength and higher ultimate strength while keeping considerable elongations compared with the RT‐EPT samples because of the finer recrystallized structure in the LN‐EPT samples. This attempt of LN‐EPT may shed some new light on developing the cryogenic electropulsing‐assisted forming methods for metals in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Henan Institute of Advanced Technology Zhengzhou University 97 Wenhua Road Zhengzhou 450001 P. R. China
Shi-changxu Innovation Center for Advanced Materials Institute of Metal Research Chinese Academy of Sciences 72 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016 P. R. China
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Science and Technology of China Shenyang 110016 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12289-011-1045-810.1007/s12289-011-1045-8 ↗
2. 10.1179/1743284714Y.000000068010.1179/1743284714Y.0000000680 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.008 ↗
4. 10.1557/JMR.2000.015210.1557/JMR.2000.0152 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matlet.2003.11.03510.1016/j.matlet.2003.11.035 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20180134510.1002/adem.201801345 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01822-610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01822-6 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-014-5949-610.1007/s00170-014-5949-6 ↗
9. 10.1557/jmr.2009.043610.1557/jmr.2009.0436 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11661-011-0770-410.1007/s11661-011-0770-4 ↗
11. 10.1557/jmr.2012.29210.1557/jmr.2012.292 ↗
12. 10.3390/cryst1010088410.3390/cryst10100884 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.2002.043810.1557/JMR.2002.0438 ↗
14. 10.1080/02670836.2017.127985610.1080/02670836.2017.1279856 ↗
15. 10.1557/JMR.2003.021310.1557/JMR.2003.0213 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.04.01310.1016/j.msea.2018.04.013 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16004410.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160044 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.10310.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.103 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13841210.1016/j.msea.2019.138412 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10827910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108279 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12613-015-1087-x10.1007/s12613-015-1087-x ↗
22. 10.3390/met912125310.3390/met9121253 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.403779810.1115/1.4037798 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00170-018-1654-110.1007/s00170-018-1654-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.05.02810.1016/j.msea.2019.05.028 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.01110.1016/j.msea.2017.12.011 ↗
27. 10.1007/s40195-020-01130-z10.1007/s40195-020-01130-z ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14123310.1016/j.msea.2021.141233 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11661-016-3804-010.1007/s11661-016-3804-0 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41563-020-00817-z10.1038/s41563-020-00817-z ↗
31. 10.1016/0036-9748(83)90491-X10.1016/0036-9748(83)90491-X ↗
32. Moiseenko M. M. · Metally. · 1987 · 1 · 162
33. 10.1179/1743284715Y.000000000110.1179/1743284715Y.0000000001 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.02810.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.028 ↗