Microstructure and Performance of Graphite/Copper Joints by Brazing with Different Interfacial Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphite/copper joints are prepared by brazing with Cu‐50TiH2 filler. The influence of the interfacial structure on the microstructure and mechanical properties of graphite/copper joints is investigated. Straight and zigzag interfacial configurations are designed. The microstructure and compositions on the brazing interface are observed and analyzed, and the shear strength of the joints is evaluated. The interfacial morphologies show a good metallurgical combination with no apparent defects. The interfacial transition layer mainly consists of a Cu‐based solid solution, Ti‐Cu intermetallic compound, and small amounts of TiC near the graphite substrate. The widths of the transition layer are ≈25–50 and 490 μm, respectively, for straight and zigzag interfacial configurations. There is a high hardness region that corresponds to the transition layer close to the graphite matrix. The shear strength of the joint with a zigzag structure interface can reach 17.9 MPa, which increases by 2.75 times compared to that of the straight interface. The zigzag structure between the graphite and the transition layer effectively improves the joint strength due to the increases in the bonding area and deflection of the fracture path.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Xi'an University of Technology 5 South Jinhua Road Xi'an 710048 China
Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory for Electrical Materials and Infiltration Technology Xi'an University of Technology Xi'an Shaanxi 710048 China
Yunnan Chihong Zn&Ge CO., LTD Qujing Yunnan 655011 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20160087610.1002/adem.201600876 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20190071910.1002/adem.201900719 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.05.00210.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.05.002 ↗
4. 10.1002/adem.20180081010.1002/adem.201800810 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.05910.1016/j.msea.2013.11.059 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.03910.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.039 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.10410.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.104 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.09510.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.095 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.40710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.407 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.07.04110.1016/j.matlet.2019.07.041 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.02110.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.021 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.01110.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.03110.1016/j.msea.2006.11.031 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-016-3340-y10.1007/s11661-016-3340-y ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.016 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10853-015-9415-010.1007/s10853-015-9415-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.01310.1016/j.msea.2007.11.013 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.08310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.083 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.03510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.035 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.02410.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0925-9635(98)00439-710.1016/S0925-9635(98)00439-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.11.00310.1016/j.msec.2008.11.003 ↗