Enhanced Creep Resistance of an Ultrafine‐Grained Ti–6Al–4V Alloy with Modified Surface by Ion Implantation and (Ti + V)N Coating
Source abstract
Abstract
This research examines the creep behavior of an ultrafine‐grained (UFG) Ti−6Al−4V alloy processed by equal‐channel angular pressing followed by extrusion. It is shown that modifying the surface of the UFG alloy with nitrogen ions and then applying of a coating of (Ti + V)N inhibits the softening of the UFG alloy at temperatures up to 700 K due to a barrier effect in which the coating hinders the release of dislocations onto the surface. The differences in the mechanisms of crack initiation and failure of UFG samples are also examined both with and without a coating. The prospects of the proposed approach to the improving of titanium alloys are discussed, including the formation of an UFG structure in the bulk of the material and subsequent modification by ion‐plasma methods for the manufacture of highly loaded parts operating at elevated operating temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics of Advanced Materials Ufa State Aviation Technical University 12 K. Marx St. Ufa 450008 Russian Federation
Materials Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK
Funding
Russian Science Foundation · Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/21663831.2015.106054310.1080/21663831.2015.1060543 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.03810.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.01810.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.018 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01338-110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01338-1 ↗
5. 10.2320/matertrans.46.202010.2320/matertrans.46.2020 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.10210.1016/j.msea.2011.12.102 ↗
7. 10.3139/146.11023410.3139/146.110234 ↗
8. 10.1002/adem.20150063010.1002/adem.201500630 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.07310.1016/j.msea.2017.04.073 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.10610.1016/j.msea.2017.12.106 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.326-328.52010.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.326-328.520 ↗
12. Kolobov Y. R. · 2004 · 621
13. Veiga C. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 32 · 133
14. 10.1007/s10853-013-7305-x10.1007/s10853-013-7305-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.00610.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.006 ↗
16. Zepka S. · 2017 · 185
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.11510.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.115 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.727-728.5010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.727-728.50 ↗
19. Panin V. E. · Phys. Mesomech. · 1999 · 2 · 5
20. Klimenov V. A. · Phys. Mesomech. · 1999 · 2 · 141
21. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.03310.1016/j.wear.2012.12.033 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10853-016-9751-810.1007/s10853-016-9751-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.018 ↗
24. Semenova I. P. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 48 · 62
25. 10.1088/1757-899X/194/1/01203510.1088/1757-899X/194/1/012035 ↗
26. 10.1299/kikaia.64.147510.1299/kikaia.64.1475 ↗
27. Hearn E. J. · 1997 · 450