Scaling‐Up of Nano‐Architected Microstructures: A Mechanical Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
Nano‐ and micro‐architected materials generated by ultra‐high‐resolution 3D printing techniques, such as two‐photon polymerization direct laser writing (TPP‐DLW) or projection micro‐stereolithography (PμSL), have garnered great interest due to their ability to achieve exceptional combinations of material properties. The scalability of these materials, however, remains a crucial challenge as larger high‐resolution samples require stitching smaller blocks of the structure of interest together. Herein, scaling techniques and testing methodologies to investigate the effect of stitching on the integrity and mechanical behavior of TPP‐DLW parts under tensile load are explored. Specifically, stitched log‐pile I‐beam specimens with relative densities of 21.5% and 54.7% are tested herein. The micro‐tensile tests reveal that the higher‐density log‐pile samples exhibit brittle behavior with fracture loads at least four times higher than those of lower‐density samples. The location of sample failure depends on the type of stitch introduced in the sample, as well as on the relative sample density. Overall, this study highlights the importance of stitching techniques and relative density for the design of nano‐ and micro‐architected materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Southern California Los Angeles CA 90089 USA
Materials Science Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA 94550 USA
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research · U.S. Department of Energy
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1364/OME.1.00061410.1364/OME.1.000614 ↗
2. 10.1038/3508913010.1038/35089130 ↗
3. 10.1002/lpor.20071003910.1002/lpor.200710039 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.131514711110.1073/pnas.1315147111 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.125590810.1126/science.1255908 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.118635110.1126/science.1186351 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.493081910.1063/1.4930819 ↗
8. 10.1364/OL.35.00109410.1364/OL.35.001094 ↗
9. 10.1364/OL.35.00016610.1364/OL.35.000166 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20100406010.1002/adma.201004060 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.00710.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.007 ↗
12. 10.1586/erd.12.4810.1586/erd.12.48 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20160251410.1002/smll.201602514 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.04.01410.1016/j.eml.2016.04.014 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-018-03071-910.1038/s41467-018-03071-9 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20160529310.1002/adma.201605293 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20120058410.1002/adma.201200584 ↗
18. 10.1002/adem.20170062510.1002/adem.201700625 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat373810.1038/nmat3738 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.00510.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.01910.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
23. 10.1098/rspa.2010.021510.1098/rspa.2010.0215 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
25. J.Greer Materials by design: using architecture and nanomaterial size effects to attain unexplored properties presented at Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2015 Symp. The National Academies Press Washington DC2016.
26. 10.1557/mrs.2015.26310.1557/mrs.2015.263 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-0-323-35321-2.00018-210.1016/B978-0-323-35321-2.00018-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.02610.1016/j.addma.2018.03.026 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.05.00810.1016/j.optlastec.2018.05.008 ↗
30. 10.3390/nano807049810.3390/nano8070498 ↗
31. 10.1080/15361055.2017.140623710.1080/15361055.2017.1406237 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20170242510.1002/adfm.201702425 ↗
33. 10.13182/FST15-22210.13182/FST15-222 ↗
34. 10.1557/adv.2018.64810.1557/adv.2018.648 ↗
35. 10.1038/nmat456110.1038/nmat4561 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.150912011210.1073/pnas.1509120112 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.403644510.1115/1.4036445 ↗
38. 10.1364/OE.21.02096410.1364/OE.21.020964 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20140236610.1002/adma.201402366 ↗
40. 10.1364/OE.17.00214310.1364/OE.17.002143 ↗
41. Stein O. · Proc. SPIE · 2017 · 10354 · 9
42. 10.1002/pat.56710.1002/pat.567 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.01110.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.011 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10853-011-5491-y10.1007/s10853-011-5491-y ↗
45. 10.1177/109963620200400222710.1177/1099636202004002227 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.13310.1016/j.msea.2006.05.133 ↗
47. 10.1364/OE.24.02707710.1364/OE.24.027077 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20170185010.1002/adma.201701850 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.eml.2015.03.00610.1016/j.eml.2015.03.006 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma00148a03410.1021/ma00148a034 ↗
51. 10.1021/cr300519710.1021/cr3005197 ↗
52. 10.1111/ffe.1241610.1111/ffe.12416 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11837-009-0176-610.1007/s11837-009-0176-6 ↗